Band of Light and Luminous Cylinder UFOs.

The Forensic Analysis of Extraterrestrial Spacecraft, and UFO Entry/Exit Portal Events.

 

This is a comparative analysis of UFO anomalies described as "Band Of Light and Cylinder" UFO. Each object is matched

based on overall (visual/structural) characteristics.

This research is built upon State of the Art, High Definition evidence.

Band of Light UFO

The following research sample is constructed upon RAW forensic comparatives. No image modifications (CGI) are applied to these

samples. Where possible, each image represents a motion picture file. The initial documentation of UFO was performed using Time

Lapse photography. This technique was used to extend the recording time of a Remote Drop Camera. Time Lapse on each file is

recorded using 30 fps frame rate. Though it is TL, that file must have a frame rate reference in order to be recognized as a

playable video file. This data is AVID DNxHD145 High Definition workflow. Avid Media Composer 7.0.4/8.6.5. Boris Fx BCC

AVID Media Composer 7.0.3

Avid Media Composer 6.5 BORIS FXwww.nikonusa.com

All video/image files used in this study are AVID/Boris Fx Technology/Nikon HD 35 mm full frame digital ISO 204800-4 Million.

Data in this study will have supportive references (chapters) associated with objective specifics

UFO Taken by Gruman 3-08-1960 b

The Basis of Analysis, the Band of Light UFO

First Contact: The Band of Light UFO by Grumman Ground Satellite Tracking technology 3-08-1960. During the launch of

ECHO 1, a US Military surveillance satellite, ground radar detected an object (much larger) tracking the satellite. UFO imaged

is substantially large, 4-5 aircraft carriers in length. This data suggests variations in size and objects while maintaining

qualities associated with base study objects, (they're the same technology). This ship is generally an extended line of

light. The length of that line varies from 1 aircraft carrier to as many as 7 carriers in a row in length. This material is built

on a multitude of examples in normal and infrared light.

UFO Taken by Gruman 3-08-1960 array setup

The Grumman 3-08-1960 imaging array systems setup, documented the Band of Light UFO object using a multiple

camera system. Though film based systems, this concept substantially upgraded, is utilized in this forensic

documentation.

Camera array UFOdc

My array is built along the principles of the 1960 Grumman technology, however; substantially upgraded with

Hyper Full Spectrum Infrared and ISO 409600- ISO 4 Million optical systems. Data associated to this location and

the Spatial anomalies (Portals) are forensically documented.

Logan Circle spatial  view 1 camera array positioning example2 trajectory

Looking down, the anomaly would be going the opposite direction on video, as this in line with the White House.

Phobos UFO_USSR Consolate Pres destruida por aliens ufos 2015

Press conference in 1989 regarding the destruction of Martian Probes Phobos 1 and 2.

The Phobos Mystery The Mystery Moon of Mars 2

The Phobos Mystery: The Mystery Moon of Mars 2. The Russian Probe Phobos 2 imaged an object directly beside the

Martian Moon Phobos. The anomaly is a Band of Light UFO. Its size is greater than the Martian Moon when placed

side by side.

Phobos jpg

One of the very last images sent by Phobos 2, prior to being destroyed by the aliens.

The Phobos Mystery The Mystery Moon of Mars 2 b

Phobos 2 "disappeared" in March 1989 after this image was taken.

The Band of Light UFO imaged by Phobos 2 is a 100% match to the anomalies presented in this study. We have

forensic authentication of the UFO anomalies based on this Russian and other image samples, additional comparatives

further authenticate the validity of these extraordinary Extraterrestrial anomalies. They (craft occupants) are here

on Earth.

phobos6

Russian probe Phobos 2's last transmission showed a band of light (Cigar) UFO in the vicinity of the Martian Moon

Phobos. Phobos has long thought to be an inconsistency with Mars, and possibly an artificial structure (spacecraft).

The Phobos Mystery Band of Light UFO

The anomaly imaged by Phobos 2 prior to its destruction, showed a long luminous object consistent with Cigar

Cylinder UFOs presented in this visual comparative.

11-26-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

11-26-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM SDM Analysis. In some cases such as this, it's obvious, this object is

within close proximity, however an erie match to the anomaly which destroyed the Russian Phobos 2. This forensic

match is imaged in P-53 Restricted Airspace (The White House). This is clearly associated with a Spatial Portal. The

anomaly incrementally materializes into the airspace. D5 Nikon

AREA 51 UFO Band of Light

National Geographic reference file, click on image for metadata and other details.

First contact with the UFO Band of Light, is in the airspace of AREA 51 while filming MTV-CMT "My Big Redneck

Vacation" in 2012. Using a newly acquired Nikon D4 (ISO 204800), I captured 5 frames in sequence of this object

entering a wormhole. This base sample is captured using D4 High definition imaging (AREA 51). My motion

picture samples (though limited motion picture), are extraordinary nevertheless! NASA data confirmation

AREA 51  Band of Light UFO

Click on image for AREA 51 UFO footage*

Band of Light UFO in AREA 51 airspace, and the wormholes associated with that area and all areas of Earth as defined by

NASA. This object communicated, telepathically to me. It instructed me to leave the area immediately, while my BBC/MTV

film crews were being detained via gunpoint by AREA 51 security personnel. In each instance of documenting this anomaly,

the anomaly "materializes" into the area, however; does not fly into it as we would expect. They simply appear, from out

of nowhere! D4 Nikon

Event 3, 5 minutes later..4-07-2013

While filming Uncovering Aliens (BBC/Discovery) in Sedona, my camera kept imaging "streaks of light", like this

in most of my Time Lapse videos. The problem is these are not slow shutter speeds. The frequency of events

suggests the presence of an Extraterrestrial base. Normally, one would conclude that this streak is associated

with "Slow Shutter Speeds", however; there would be several streaks if this was associated to a slow shutter.

This may actually be an ET Spacecraft. D4 Nikon

12-25-2016 UFO Band of Light WARP SDM Analysis

12-25-2016 UFO Band of Light WARP SDM Analysis. The variations in length could also indicate proximity to

the camera or substantial variations in size, or both. The worlds first forensic comparative analysis based on

exact evidence. Each object is exactly alike, however in variations of length. I and an associate, Ken Ballos RIP

witnessed this anomaly in Richmond Virginia, as it flew above our heads in his front yard. Based on my research

This is indeed an Extraterrestrial Spacecraft, not the result of a slow frame rate and shutter speeds. D5 Nikon

Event 4, again 3-5 minutes later

The anomalies imaged are massive, these are 20 mm lens images. Each sample illustrated a massiveness of

this object. Based on the 20 mm lens, my estimate of size of this UFO is 6 aircraft carriers, if lined up in a row.

Massive! Its not the result of a slow shutter speed, my forensic data @ 60 fps shows with 100% certainty, the

structural definition of this extremely large UFO anomaly. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 2  Sedona 4-08-2013

At the time of this capture, I had no idea this object could bend Time and Space (Dematerialize), and have

extraordinary Speed and Flight capabilities. As my research evolved technologically, so did the quality of the

forensic data. The basis of imaging (D4 Nikon ISO 204800), upgraded several times (D4s Nikon ISO 409600),

to our current level of sensitivity (D5 Nikon ISO 4 Million). At D4s I achieved 60 fps while documenting UFOs

incrementally materialize into my fixed pool of analysis. The data is proof positive of an Extraterrestrial

presence in our airspace. D4 Nikon

10-26-2016 UFO Band of Light FB Tracker Analysis

10-26-2016 UFO Band of Light FB Tracker Analysis. Using Autodesk 3dsamax 2016 Virtual Camera technology to

track this object in flight, we get to see this extraterrestrial spacecraft up close and in step with its forwards

velocity. Applying forensic applications to further identify and examine unknown Extraterrestrial objects (spacecraft)

D5 Nikon

Pale Band of Light UFO in Sedona Arizona airspace

Direct contact with this object did not transpire until 2 months later in Sedona Arizona, while filming "Uncovering Aliens"

for the BBC/Discovery Networks in 2013. Using Time Lapse photography, I was instructed telepathically, to film both the

entrance and exiting of the Band of Light UFO, through Spatial Portals in Sedona. However extraordinary, there are issues

associated with Time Lapse imagery, many can not escape? The misidentification of objects and shutter speed blurring,

under the conditions in which sync rate is achieved in Motion Pictures. (24/30 FPS). Not understanding photography under

nocturnal conditions or general lighting conditions, because most people use point and shoot technology, thinking

everything is point and shoot? These issues associated with applications oriented, extremely limited imaging cellphone

systems. Understanding consumer based products are limited specifically to conventional applications and environments,

under extreme conditions, these devices fail miserably in capturing the moment, or any moment of importance. D4 Nikon

Uncovering Aliens BLACK OPS CONSPIRACY  UFO Sedona AZ 4 07 2013 Analysis 2 Pt1

Forensic samples obtained by advanced imaging systems (Nikon D4 in 2013), in this Second Contact in Sedona Arizona.

The anomaly communicated via telepathy. The problems associated with these samples are associated with those that

have a limited understanding of cinematography (photography). They assumed the line is a jet moving fast and that the

shutter speed used (slow) is causing blurring? Because this is Time Lapse, they assumed it involved slow exposures.

Those assumptions would be correct if I used the conventional technology readily available to the public, however; I do

not use conventional camera technology.

UFO Sedona 4-07-2013

The existence of Spatial Portals (Wormholes) associated with extraterrestrial events in any given area, are the products

of ET technology. This Wormhole Stargate Portal is connected to a much larger Portal located at the North Magnetic

Pole. The secondary Wormhole is associated with the South Antarctic Magnetic Pole. Sedona is indeed very much like

Mars. As my cameras upgraded, so did my examples, in higher speed motion pictures. D4 Nikon

wmnight UFOdc

I cannot confirm or deny this sample, my issues are with the streak of orange and red lights on the ground?

These streaks suggest the possibility that this maybe a Time Exposure. I'm also not certain of the echoes

associated the anomaly in the air (etch of light). Looking closely at both the anomaly and the traffic on the

street, this could be a commercial jet Time Exposure.

(I see a red and green streaks [navigation lights] above the band of light).

Washington Monument 2-14-2011

However confirmation on the validity of the US Park Services camera image showing the Band of Light UFO can be

established with the supportive data below.

12-30-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP SDM Tracker Analysis 2

12-30-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP SDM Tracker Analysis 2.

The basis of this research is built upon current information, relative to the Band of Light UFO. In each example, it's

represented as a streak, luminous straight line of light which varies in length. D5 Nikon 60 fps

12-09-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Tracker Analysis 4

12-09-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Tracker Analysis 4. Each example showing the exact same thing,

all sampled within the exact same airspace. A fixed pool of analysis. When possible, a Virtual Camera is applied

to the original footage and the UFO is tracked on a one to one basis. What the UFO does, so does the VC. D5 Nikon

11-27-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Analysis

11-27-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Analysis. We maybe looking at the same object, or several of the same

objects in various altitudes. On days where there are multiple examples, it would be safe to assume there are

multiple crafts and Spatial Portals in which these objects utilize upon entry and exiting this realm, within my pool

of analysis, which is fixed. The deviations in this sample are associated too AREA 51 Nevada and Sedona Arizona.

D5 Nikon

11-21-2016 UFO Cylinder SM SDM WARP IR Analysis

11-21-2016 UFO Cylinder SM SDM WARP IR Analysis. This UFO Cylinder object is on an upwards vertical

trajectory. The variations in object length are apparent with each example. This is Full Spectrum Infrared

Hybrid FSIR imaging technology. D4 FSIR Variable IR 500nm-950nm.

11-07-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light Green-beam SM WARP Full Analysis 2

11-07-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light Green-beam SM WARP Full Analysis 2. D5 Nikon

11-05-2016 UFO Band of Light 4 SM WARP SDM Analysis

11-05-2016 UFO Band of Light 4 SM WARP SDM Analysis. D5 Nikon

11-05-2016 UFO Band of Light 3 SM WARP Analysis

11-05-2016 UFO Band of Light 3 SM WARP Analysis. D5 Nikon

10-26-2016 UFO Band of Light 3 SM WARP SDM Analysis

10-26-2016 UFO Band of Light 3 SM WARP SDM Analysis. D5 Nikon

10-23-2016 UFO Band of Light Transient WARP FB Analysis

10-23-2016 UFO Band of Light Transient WARP FB Analysis. D5 Nikon

10-21-2016 UFO Band of Light 2 Tracker Full Analysis

10-21-2016 UFO Band of Light 2 Tracker Full Analysis. D5 Nikon

Cylinder 4 of 4 with propulsion contrail  imaged 8-01-2013

Cylinder 4 of 4 with propulsion contrail imaged 8-01-2013. D4 Nikon

Cylinder UFO 6-19-2013 enhanced

Cylinder UFO 6-19-2013. D4 Nikon frames from Time Lapse

10-19-2016 UFO Band of Light 2 SM WARP SDM Analysis

10-19-2016 UFO Band of Light 2 SM WARP SDM Analysis. Nikon D5 60 fps

D5U_2155 UFO Band of Light FB Analysis_000078

10-14-2016. D5 Nikon @ 60 fps

D5U_2126 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Analysis_000136

10-13-2016 Click on image for video. Nikon D5

DSC_2018 UFO Band of Light closeup WARP SDM Analysis 2_000098

10-10-2016. D5 Nikon

8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light 4 SM SDM Analysis

8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light 4 SM SDM Analysis IR. D4 FSIR Nikon

8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light- 2 within Seconds Apart IR Analysis

8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light- 2 within Seconds Apart IR Analysis . D4 FSIR Nikon

8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light SM SDM IR Analysis

8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light SM SDM IR Analysis (JAL Flight 1628 in 1986) D4 FSIR Nikon

7-12-2016 UFO JAL 1628 3rd Object FB SDM Full IR Analysis 2

7-12-2016 UFO JAL 1628 3rd Object FB SDM Full IR Analysis 2. D4S Nikon

7-07-2016 UFO Cylinder 3 SM WARP IR Analysis

7-07-2016 UFO Cylinder 3 SM WARP IR Analysis. D4 FSIR Nikon

7-07-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Full SM Analysis IR

7-07-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Full SM Analysis IR. D4 FSIR Nikon

3-17-2016 UFO Cylinder SM WARP IR Analysis

3-17-2016 UFO Cylinder SM WARP IR Analysis. D4 FSIR Nikon

3-16-2016 UFO Cylinder 4 SM WARP SDM Analysis

3-16-2016 UFO Cylinder 4 SM WARP SDM Analysis. D4 FSIR Nikon

1-06-2016 UFO Band of Light IR Flyby Analysis 2

1-06-2016 UFO Band of Light IR Flyby Analysis 2. D4S NIkon

12045795_10153279874739195_2197998550090982286_o.jpg

Evidence from a second party source, a child onboard an aircraft filming out his window*

8-27-2015UFOGreenBeamSDMWARPSDMAnalysis

8-27-2015 UFO Green Beam SDM WARP SDM Analysis. D4S Nikon

1-10-2015 UFO 4 SM WARP Analysis

1-10-2015 UFO 4 SM WARP Analysis. D4s Nikon

12-13-2014 UFO WARP SDM Analysis

12-13-2014 UFO WARP SDM Analysis; this object is consistent with an anomaly imaged in AREA 51 Nevada and

Sedona Arizona. D4s Nikon

8-14-2014 UFO Green Beam WARP Multiphase Analysis

8-14-2014 UFO Green Beam WARP Multiphase Analysis. Filmed @ 50 FPS, the anomaly seemed to be in front and

behind itself, simultaneously. D4s Nikon

7-30-2014 UFO SM WARP SDM Portal 2 Analysis

7-30-2014 UFO SM WARP SDM Portal 2 Analysis. D4s Nikon

5-12-2014 UFO Portal 1 SM WARP SDM Analysis

5-12-2014 UFO Portal 1 SM WARP SDM Analysis. D4s Nikon

5-07-2014 UFO Portal 1 SM SDM Flyby Analysis

5-07-2014 UFO Portal 1 SM SDM Flyby Analysis. Constantly repeating and always in the same airspace and direction.

D4s Nikon

5-05-2014 UFO Portal 3 UFO WARP SDM Analysis

5-05-2014 UFO Portal 3 UFO WARP SDM Analysis. D4s Nikon

5-04-2014 UFO Portal 1 WARP Flyby Analysis

5-04-2014 UFO Portal 1 WARP Flyby Analysis. D4s Nikon

4-17-2014 UFO Portal 3 Analysis

4-17-2014 UFO Portal 3 Analysis. D4s Nikon

4-13-2014 UFO Portal 7 UFO at WARP (Sudden Dematerialization)

4-13-2014 UFO Portal 7 UFO at WARP (Sudden Dematerialization). D4s Nikon

2-26-2014 Cylinder Enhanced

2-26-2014 Cylinder Enhanced. Files extracted from Time Lapse imagery*. D4s Nikon

Cylinder 1 of 2

2-22-2014 Cylinder 1 of 2 imaged moments apart from same POV airspace . D4s Nikon

Cylinder 2 of 2 imaged  2-22-2014

2-22-2014 Cylinder 2 of 2 imaged moments apart from same POV airspace. D4s Nikon

1-25-2017 UFO Band of Light Flyby Analysis

1-25-2017 UFO Band of Light Flyby Analysis. D5 Nikon

Cylinder 12-11-2013 while filming for the Weather Channel

Cylinder 12-11-2013 while filming for the Weather Channel. D4 Nikon

Cylinder (in same airspace as the others) 12-11-2013

12-11-2013 Cylinder (in same airspace as the others). D4 Nikon

11-25-2013 Cylinder 1 of 2 imaged from Airspace POV

Cylinder 1 of 2, 11-25-2013. How extraordinary a sample of a nightly repeating multiple event. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 2 of 2 in exact POV as Cylinder 1, however; hours later.

Cylinder 2 of 2, 11-25-2013 in exact POV as Cylinder 1, however; hours later. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 11-23-2013

11-23-2013 Cylinder, was sub orbital (within cloud fields) during time of capture. This means it was inside

the layer of clouds as it was imaged. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 3 of 3 imaged 10-26-2013

Cylinder 3 imaged 10-26-2013 is similar to an event imaged in Sedona Arizona 4-08-2013.

(Click on image for video). D4 Nikon

8-17-2013 and the nightly return of what is now a common anomaly UFO

8-17-2013*, I have a multitude of examples, all which look exactly like this event frame extracted from

Time Lapse. D4 Nikon

8-13-2014 UFO Cylinder Green tail WARP Analysis

8-13-2014 UFO Cylinder Green tail WARP Analysis. (Note the dates associated with these files*)

Am I documenting a Spatial Time Warp? Are these (8-17-2013*/8-13-2014) the same anomaly? 60 FPS D4S Nikon

8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis

8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis. There is no logical explanation for how an event can

repeat on the same day (each year). However; this data shows that events do repeat

(on the same day each year). D4S Nikon

Cylinder 1 of 2 imaged in camera  POV

8-15-2013 and the return of an unusual UFO anomaly. Even more, 2 like objects imaged in this stream of

video. D4 Nikon

8-03-2015 UFO Cylinder Green Beam WARP Sound Analysis

8-03-2015 UFO Cylinder Green Beam WARP Sound Analysis.

The sound elements generally associated the the UFO or any object recorded under these conditions, is

missing. The camera is programmed to take 1 picture, every second for a programmed period of time.

Because DSLR digital video is limited to 20 minutes (30 on higher end cameras), the camera is unable to

record for extended periods. However an

extended duration can be recorded in Time Lapse mode using an intervalometer. This is a base application in

the advanced D series cameras by Nikon. (D4/D4s/D5)

11-18-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM WARP SDM Analysis

11-18-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM WARP SDM Analysis. In a substantial number of these samples,

the UFO Band of Light emits a Nuclear Green Contrail. In all the examples, where applicable, the UFO

materializes into the given airspace, they do not fly into it, as you would assume a meteor does?

They are entering through portals that are connected to a much larger system, Wormhole. D5 Nikon

Cylinder 2 of 2 imaged 9-18-2013

Cylinder 2 of 5 imaged 9-18-2013. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 9-02-2013 object 2

Cylinder 9-02-2013 . On any given night, there may be several hits relative to this object. Registered in a

single frame, imaged at 1/60th of a second at F 1.4, using 102400 ISO. (Video stills) D4 Nikon

UFK_9558 st_009824 cylinder 9-02-2013

Cylinder 9-02-2013 shows the object at the same altitude as the cloud layer. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 8-31-2013

Cylinder 8-31-2013 has the same angular vector as the "Golden" vector sample below. 2 objects imaged in

the same POV with exact angular/directional attributes. D4 Nikon

Cylinder UFO 8-04-2013  Enhanced

Cylinder UFO 8-04-2013 Enhanced. D4 Nikon

Cylinder evet 3, is a continuation of the first sample of this evening

Cylinder event 3 imaged 8-02-2013. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 7-15-2013 Washington DC

Click on image for Sedona Arizona video sample.

Cylinder 7-15-2013 Washington DC. D4 Nikon

Pocatello, Idaho 7-02-2013, Wayne Miller Photographer

Pocatello, Idaho 7-02-2013 (please go the the Sedona chapter of this research study)

Cylinder 6-24-2013 (1 of 3) Wayne Miller photograph. D90 Nikon

Cylinder UFO  6-20-2013 enhanced

Cylinder UFO 6-20-2013. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 2 6-20-2013  (2 of 2 imaged)

Cylinder 2 6-20-2013. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 1 of 2 imaged 5-17-2013

5-17-2013 Cylinder. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 2, imaged 1 hour later that the first object, on 5-17-2013, POV Washington DC

Cylinder 2, imaged 1 hour later that the first object, on 5-17-2013. D4 Nikon

Cylinder UFO 5-13-2013

Cylinder UFO# 1 of 2, 5-13-2013. D4 Nikon

Cylinder UFO imaged 2-17-2013 in Washington DC

Cylinder UFO imaged 2-17-2013. D4 Nikon

Cylinder 2-20-2013 from exactly the same POV as 2-17-2013

Cylinder 2-20-2013 from exactly the same POV as 2-17-2013. D4 Nikon

The Cylinder UFO

Blond and Blue Eyes

I am not one to take what cannot be confirmed and post it, however; this was sent to me from an associate

in Germany. In the illustration is a Cylinder-Cigar like object which is a 100% match to what I am presenting

in this forensic comparative analysis.

UFO - Cylinder Chased by Soviet MIG-21 Accelerates

UFO - Cylinder Chased by Soviet MIG-21 Accelerates. Though this is Low Resolution footage, it shows an object

with a familiar configuration (Cigar Cylinder UFO). Estimated date of event, The (1950's).

La NASA filme des images  ovni sept 2015 2.jpg

NASA. Nikon D3S

La NASA filme des images  ovni sept 2015

La NASA filme des images d'un ├ętrange ovni (sept 2015). NASA captured this anomaly long before I did,

however; my samples are Ultra HD with 60 fps frame rate and Sound in 7.1 DTS. Nikon D3S

2-17-2013 UFO Green Beam TL Re-analysis Enhanced  3

It's obvious why this is referred to as a Cylinder/Cigar UFO, note the front and back of this anomaly.

The shape is indeed a Cigar. D4 Nikon

2-20-2013 UFO SM WARP SDM TL Analysis  D

Everything is consistent. D4 Nikon

Mexican Volcanic UFO activity

Mexican Cylinder Cigar UFO entering Popocatepetl Volcano reported by my associate Jaime Maussan.

UFF_2334 Cylinder

The Cylinder Cigar shaped UFO is defined by its name, a Cylinder Cigar shaped craft. Shreveport Louisiana 11-01-2012. D4 Nikon

A 100% match to the anomaly I imaged in Shreveport LA

November 16, 2012, 15 days after my initial capture, this stunning video was filmed in Japan. The example is a 100%

match to Shreveport Louisiana 11-01-2012. D4 Nikon

11-18-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM WARP SDM Analysis

The Nuclear Green contrail is associated to this objects propulsion matrix. It usually happens when the object first

materializes into the airspace, and then goes to Warp. (They don't fly into the airspace, they materialize into it).

11-03-2016 UFO Cylinder SM WARP SDM WARP Tracker Analysis

Constantly updated materials (11-05-2016), provides a more comprehensive perspective relative to each UFO in this

case study. Each file contains the same kind of anomaly.

5-6-2014 BREAKING! MILE LONG UFOS ABOVE MARS

I will not dismiss the Secureteam's credibility based on my work. If this sample is fake, then so is the rest of my data on

this page, however; not. This sample is 100% consistent with the data on this page.

5-04-2014 UFO Beam of Light Entry Analysis

Portal Entry into our Airspace: The way in which ET enters our realm, is within the scope of Quantum Physics.

Radar can't detect what's not there, until it is there (physical manifestation). (They don't fly into the airspace; they

materialize into it). Along with the extraordinary materialization of this object are its unique sounds which were recorded

upon entry into the fixed pool of analysis (airspace). D4S NIkon

1-05-2017 UFO Cylinder SM SDM Full Tracker Analysis 1

1-05-2017 UFO Cylinder SM SDM Full Tracker Analysis 1. Clearly we see this object incrementally materialize

into the airspace.It has a cylindrical shape defined by "round" medicine capsule front and rear definitions. D5 Nikon

4-13-2015 UFO Beam of Light Flyby Analysis

The Cylinder flyby showed this object was in a curved trajectory (turning). Its a full flyby of the Cylinder UFO, captured

using Nikon D4S @ 60 fps. In this example, the UFO is maintaining a curved trajectory. (Its not flying straight). This quality

is not one of the properties or attributes of a naturally occurring phenomena such as a meteor. D4S Nikon

10-17-2016 UFO Cylinder WARP SDM Analysis

Cylinder exiting the airspace through known Spatial Portal (within the pool of analysis). D5 capture shows the

incremental dematerialization of this object upon entrance of the Portal.

1-03-2016 UFO Sphere SM and Green Beam UFO SM WARP SDM Analysis

Both this and the file above it, are within the same airspace (Pool of Analysis: PoA). We can conclude from the

frequency and types of events, that my PoA is a pathway to and from Portals. Probabilities associated to naturally

occurring events/ phenomena indicate that these samples are not naturally occurring, however; intelligently control

space craft with exceptional capabilities. D4S Nikon

12-14-2014 UFO 3 Green Beam SM WARP SMD Analysis

The data associated with this Cylinder UFO is forensic. I have shown the possibilities associated with this UFO anomaly

with various levels of documentation. D4S Nikon

12-14-2014 UFO 4 Green Beam 2 SM WARP SDM Analysis

The various degrees of the anomaly includes directional variations, however most trajectories maintain consistency. D4S Nikon

12-14-2014 UFO 12 SM WARP SDM Analysis

The various degrees of the anomaly includes directional variations, as shown here. It's the same as the sample

above it, however; its flight trajectory is 180 degrees different than the first video sample showing the same

anomaly. D4S Nikon

12-13-2014 UFO 8 SM WARP SDM Analysis

The sample are quite specific, and easily categorized based on overall object (UFO) definitions. D4S Nikon

12-12-2014 UFO 2 Green Beam SM WARP SDM Analysis

These 2 samples (below inclusive), are of the same object, however one is larger due to proximity to the lens. The

lens configurations preclude this technology from seeing outer atmosphere events. For outer atmosphere 400 mm

would be required. However, long lens do not have light gathering capabilities at greater than f/2.8. Light gathering

capabilities are diminish considerably in pure nocturnal environments, requiring light gathering abilities that can only

be achieved with a faster lens (f/1.4/1.8/2.0/2.8). Beyond these levels, in nocturnal environments, the lens is totally

useless unless used for duration imaging (Time Exposures). D4S Nikon

12-12-2014 UFO 3 Green Beam SM WARP SDM Analysis

Each showing the same things under different time conditions, the area of analysis is relative (fixed). D4S Nikon

11-21-2016 UFO Cylinder SM SDM WARP IR Analysis

2 samples of a Cylinder UFO both coming and going, this sample going.. D4 FSIR Nikon

11-21-2016 UFO Cylinder WARP SDM Analysis

2 samples of a Cylinder UFO both coming and going, this sample coming.. both along the same yet opposite

trajectories. D4 FSIR Nikon

12-04-2014 UFO 2 SM WARP Analysis

All samples are imaged in a fixed region of Geo-space, though space changes due to orbital rotations, the events are

all fixed geographically by the ground coordinates of the imaging systems.

12-01-2014 UFO SM WARP SDM Portal 3 Analysis

Depending on the objects forwards velocity, some samples show what is the objects propulsion matrix contrail. Its

generally Green*

UFO 8-05-2013 (return)

The Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail. D4 Nikon

11-21-2016 UFO Cylinder Green Beam WARP Analysis

The Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail. Proof is indeed in the pudding, with this extraordinary sample (IR) showing

the Nuclear Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail associated to the Cylinder UFO (Going to WARP).

Depending on the objects forwards velocity, the contrail is most apparent at maximum WARP* as shown in the

event documentation These samples do not meet the definition associated with a "Shooting Star".

Definition: a small, rapidly moving meteor burning up on entering the earth's atmosphere. These files do not meet

the definitions associated with a Shooting Star?

(They're not entering into the atmosphere; they're materializing into it) D5 Nikon

9-17-2014 UFO Green Beam SM WARP SDM Analysis

The propulsion systems onboard these craft must be Nuclear to achieve Quantum WARP (Teleportation) of the

entire craft and its occupants, through Space. The objects "materialize into the airspace", not "fly into it, as

a "Shooting Star". D4S Nikon

8-15-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Green Beam SM WARP SMD Analysis

8-15-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Green Beam SM WARP SMD Analysis. (Note: This is an exact match to 8-14-2015) D5 Nikon

8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis

8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis. How is this possible? 2 exact samples, exactly 1 year apart and

essentially on the same date. Both samples show the exact same things! D4S Nikon

Cylinder 1 of 2 imaged in camera  POV

8-15-2013 and the return of an unusual UFO anomaly and its Nuclear Green contrail

These are repeating objects and events. Where indicated note the dates associated with each comparative (where

indicated) Is there a temporal anomaly associated with this region of Space known as my Pool of Analysis? How am

I imaging events with exactness, though on the same day on a different year? D4 Nikon

5-19-2014 UFO Portal 4 SM WARP SDM Analysis

The example clearly shows the UFO anomaly materializing into the airspace. There is a distinctive difference in an object

that flies into the airspace as compared to an object which uses Quantum materialization to enter into the airspace. D4S Nikon

12-16-2014 UFO 6 Green Beam SM WARP SDM Analysis

Matching objects and the frequencies associated with exact events, we can draw a conclusion from the plethora of

evidence obtained nightly from a fixed Pool of Analysis (90 degrees straight up over my roof 4 blocks from the White

House.) D4S Nikon

1-10-2015 UFO 2 SM WARP SDM Analysis

The size differentials may be attributed to the altitude relative to the anomaly at the time of capture. D4S Nikon

12-26-2014 UFO SM WARP Analysis

The possibility may also exist, that these objects do vary in size and displacement. That these smaller examples

may be scout ships (small Bands of Light). D4S Nikon

12-20-2014 UFO Green Beam SM WARP SDM Analysis

Consistencies associated to these samples, and the repeating levels of action within my fixed pool of analysis, have

demonstrated with certainty, the validity associated to UFOs and the truths associated to Spatial Anomalies (Portals)

as demonstrated by this sample, concludes a strong extraterrestrial presence within the Washington DC airspace. D4S Nikon

1-21-2015 UFO WARP SDM Analysis

How they exit the airspace, especially when the exit portal is within the cloud layer which is fog like. The diffusion

associated with this event are clear indicators of altitude proximity. D4S Nikon

The White House on UFOs 2013

Well we know who most certainly is not truthful! If this ET did not exist, and I am in the same Airspace as the

White House, then how do I explain the work within this research? We voted these people into office!

Masthead History

 

NASA

www.nasa.gov/

Dr. Edgar Mitchell: Thank you Dear Friend-Rest in Peace 2-04-2016

To learn the methods I use to create these video/image files, go here:

howard university web logo

Howard University Department of Art/School of Communications

Wilbur Allen