The Forensic Analysis of Extraterrestrial Spacecraft, and UFO Entry/Exit Portal Events.
This is a comparative analysis of UFO anomalies described as "Band Of Light and Cylinder" UFO. Each object is matched
based on overall (visual/structural) characteristics.
This research is built upon State of the Art, High Definition evidence.
Band of Light UFO
The following research sample is constructed upon RAW forensic comparatives. No image modifications (CGI) are applied to these
samples. Where possible, each image represents a motion picture file. The initial documentation of UFO was performed using Time
Lapse photography. This technique was used to extend the recording time of a Remote Drop Camera. Time Lapse on each file is
recorded using 30 fps frame rate. Though it is TL, that file must have a frame rate reference in order to be recognized as a
playable video file. This data is AVID DNxHD145 High Definition workflow. Avid Media Composer 7.0.4/8.6.5. Boris Fx BCC
All video/image files used in this study are AVID/Boris Fx Technology/Nikon HD 35 mm full frame digital ISO 204800-4 Million.
Data in this study will have supportive references (chapters) associated with objective specifics
The Basis of Analysis, the Band of Light UFO
First Contact: The Band of Light UFO by Grumman Ground Satellite Tracking technology 3-08-1960. During the launch of
ECHO 1, a US Military surveillance satellite, ground radar detected an object (much larger) tracking the satellite. UFO imaged
is substantially large, 4-5 aircraft carriers in length. This data suggests variations in size and objects while maintaining
qualities associated with base study objects, (they're the same technology). This ship is generally an extended line of
light. The length of that line varies from 1 aircraft carrier to as many as 7 carriers in a row in length. This material is built
on a multitude of examples in normal and infrared light.
The Grumman 3-08-1960 imaging array systems setup, documented the Band of Light UFO object using a multiple
camera system. Though film based systems, this concept substantially upgraded, is utilized in this forensic
My array is built along the principles of the 1960 Grumman technology, however; substantially upgraded with
Hyper Full Spectrum Infrared and ISO 409600- ISO 4 Million optical systems. Data associated to this location and
the Spatial anomalies (Portals) are forensically documented.
Looking down, the anomaly would be going the opposite direction on video, as this in line with the White House.
Press conference in 1989 regarding the destruction of Martian Probes Phobos 1 and 2.
The Phobos Mystery: The Mystery Moon of Mars 2. The Russian Probe Phobos 2 imaged an object directly beside the
Martian Moon Phobos. The anomaly is a Band of Light UFO. Its size is greater than the Martian Moon when placed
side by side.
One of the very last images sent by Phobos 2, prior to being destroyed by the aliens.
Phobos 2 "disappeared" in March 1989 after this image was taken.
The Band of Light UFO imaged by Phobos 2 is a 100% match to the anomalies presented in this study. We have
forensic authentication of the UFO anomalies based on this Russian and other image samples, additional comparatives
further authenticate the validity of these extraordinary Extraterrestrial anomalies. They (craft occupants) are here
Russian probe Phobos 2's last transmission showed a band of light (Cigar) UFO in the vicinity of the Martian Moon
Phobos. Phobos has long thought to be an inconsistency with Mars, and possibly an artificial structure (spacecraft).
The anomaly imaged by Phobos 2 prior to its destruction, showed a long luminous object consistent with Cigar
Cylinder UFOs presented in this visual comparative.
11-26-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM SDM Analysis. In some cases such as this, it's obvious, this object is
within close proximity, however an erie match to the anomaly which destroyed the Russian Phobos 2. This forensic
match is imaged in P-53 Restricted Airspace (The White House). This is clearly associated with a Spatial Portal. The
anomaly incrementally materializes into the airspace. D5 Nikon
National Geographic reference file, click on image for metadata and other details.
First contact with the UFO Band of Light, is in the airspace of AREA 51 while filming MTV-CMT "My Big Redneck
Vacation" in 2012. Using a newly acquired Nikon D4 (ISO 204800), I captured 5 frames in sequence of this object
entering a wormhole. This base sample is captured using D4 High definition imaging (AREA 51). My motion
picture samples (though limited motion picture), are extraordinary nevertheless! NASA data confirmation
Click on image for AREA 51 UFO footage*
Band of Light UFO in AREA 51 airspace, and the wormholes associated with that area and all areas of Earth as defined by
NASA. This object communicated, telepathically to me. It instructed me to leave the area immediately, while my BBC/MTV
film crews were being detained via gunpoint by AREA 51 security personnel. In each instance of documenting this anomaly,
the anomaly "materializes" into the area, however; does not fly into it as we would expect. They simply appear, from out
of nowhere! D4 Nikon
While filming Uncovering Aliens (BBC/Discovery) in Sedona, my camera kept imaging "streaks of light", like this
in most of my Time Lapse videos. The problem is these are not slow shutter speeds. The frequency of events
suggests the presence of an Extraterrestrial base. Normally, one would conclude that this streak is associated
with "Slow Shutter Speeds", however; there would be several streaks if this was associated to a slow shutter.
This may actually be an ET Spacecraft. D4 Nikon
12-25-2016 UFO Band of Light WARP SDM Analysis. The variations in length could also indicate proximity to
the camera or substantial variations in size, or both. The worlds first forensic comparative analysis based on
exact evidence. Each object is exactly alike, however in variations of length. I and an associate, Ken Ballos RIP
witnessed this anomaly in Richmond Virginia, as it flew above our heads in his front yard. Based on my research
This is indeed an Extraterrestrial Spacecraft, not the result of a slow frame rate and shutter speeds. D5 Nikon
The anomalies imaged are massive, these are 20 mm lens images. Each sample illustrated a massiveness of
this object. Based on the 20 mm lens, my estimate of size of this UFO is 6 aircraft carriers, if lined up in a row.
Massive! Its not the result of a slow shutter speed, my forensic data @ 60 fps shows with 100% certainty, the
structural definition of this extremely large UFO anomaly. D4 Nikon
At the time of this capture, I had no idea this object could bend Time and Space (Dematerialize), and have
extraordinary Speed and Flight capabilities. As my research evolved technologically, so did the quality of the
forensic data. The basis of imaging (D4 Nikon ISO 204800), upgraded several times (D4s Nikon ISO 409600),
to our current level of sensitivity (D5 Nikon ISO 4 Million). At D4s I achieved 60 fps while documenting UFOs
incrementally materialize into my fixed pool of analysis. The data is proof positive of an Extraterrestrial
presence in our airspace. D4 Nikon
10-26-2016 UFO Band of Light FB Tracker Analysis. Using Autodesk 3dsamax 2016 Virtual Camera technology to
track this object in flight, we get to see this extraterrestrial spacecraft up close and in step with its forwards
velocity. Applying forensic applications to further identify and examine unknown Extraterrestrial objects (spacecraft)
Direct contact with this object did not transpire until 2 months later in Sedona Arizona, while filming "Uncovering Aliens"
for the BBC/Discovery Networks in 2013. Using Time Lapse photography, I was instructed telepathically, to film both the
entrance and exiting of the Band of Light UFO, through Spatial Portals in Sedona. However extraordinary, there are issues
associated with Time Lapse imagery, many can not escape? The misidentification of objects and shutter speed blurring,
under the conditions in which sync rate is achieved in Motion Pictures. (24/30 FPS). Not understanding photography under
nocturnal conditions or general lighting conditions, because most people use point and shoot technology, thinking
everything is point and shoot? These issues associated with applications oriented, extremely limited imaging cellphone
systems. Understanding consumer based products are limited specifically to conventional applications and environments,
under extreme conditions, these devices fail miserably in capturing the moment, or any moment of importance. D4 Nikon
Forensic samples obtained by advanced imaging systems (Nikon D4 in 2013), in this Second Contact in Sedona Arizona.
The anomaly communicated via telepathy. The problems associated with these samples are associated with those that
have a limited understanding of cinematography (photography). They assumed the line is a jet moving fast and that the
shutter speed used (slow) is causing blurring? Because this is Time Lapse, they assumed it involved slow exposures.
Those assumptions would be correct if I used the conventional technology readily available to the public, however; I do
not use conventional camera technology.
The existence of Spatial Portals (Wormholes) associated with extraterrestrial events in any given area, are the products
of ET technology. This Wormhole Stargate Portal is connected to a much larger Portal located at the North Magnetic
Pole. The secondary Wormhole is associated with the South Antarctic Magnetic Pole. Sedona is indeed very much like
Mars. As my cameras upgraded, so did my examples, in higher speed motion pictures. D4 Nikon
I cannot confirm or deny this sample, my issues are with the streak of orange and red lights on the ground?
These streaks suggest the possibility that this maybe a Time Exposure. I'm also not certain of the echoes
associated the anomaly in the air (etch of light). Looking closely at both the anomaly and the traffic on the
street, this could be a commercial jet Time Exposure.
(I see a red and green streaks [navigation lights] above the band of light).
However confirmation on the validity of the US Park Services camera image showing the Band of Light UFO can be
established with the supportive data below.
12-30-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP SDM Tracker Analysis 2.
The basis of this research is built upon current information, relative to the Band of Light UFO. In each example, it's
represented as a streak, luminous straight line of light which varies in length. D5 Nikon 60 fps
12-09-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Tracker Analysis 4. Each example showing the exact same thing,
all sampled within the exact same airspace. A fixed pool of analysis. When possible, a Virtual Camera is applied
to the original footage and the UFO is tracked on a one to one basis. What the UFO does, so does the VC. D5 Nikon
11-27-2016 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Analysis. We maybe looking at the same object, or several of the same
objects in various altitudes. On days where there are multiple examples, it would be safe to assume there are
multiple crafts and Spatial Portals in which these objects utilize upon entry and exiting this realm, within my pool
of analysis, which is fixed. The deviations in this sample are associated too AREA 51 Nevada and Sedona Arizona.
11-21-2016 UFO Cylinder SM SDM WARP IR Analysis. This UFO Cylinder object is on an upwards vertical
trajectory. The variations in object length are apparent with each example. This is Full Spectrum Infrared
Hybrid FSIR imaging technology. D4 FSIR Variable IR 500nm-950nm.
11-07-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light Green-beam SM WARP Full Analysis 2. D5 Nikon
11-05-2016 UFO Band of Light 4 SM WARP SDM Analysis. D5 Nikon
11-05-2016 UFO Band of Light 3 SM WARP Analysis. D5 Nikon
10-26-2016 UFO Band of Light 3 SM WARP SDM Analysis. D5 Nikon
10-23-2016 UFO Band of Light Transient WARP FB Analysis. D5 Nikon
10-21-2016 UFO Band of Light 2 Tracker Full Analysis. D5 Nikon
Cylinder 4 of 4 with propulsion contrail imaged 8-01-2013. D4 Nikon
Cylinder UFO 6-19-2013. D4 Nikon frames from Time Lapse
10-19-2016 UFO Band of Light 2 SM WARP SDM Analysis. Nikon D5 60 fps
10-14-2016. D5 Nikon @ 60 fps
10-13-2016 Click on image for video. Nikon D5
10-10-2016. D5 Nikon
8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light 4 SM SDM Analysis IR. D4 FSIR Nikon
8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light- 2 within Seconds Apart IR Analysis . D4 FSIR Nikon
8-17-2016 UFO Band of Light SM SDM IR Analysis (JAL Flight 1628 in 1986) D4 FSIR Nikon
7-12-2016 UFO JAL 1628 3rd Object FB SDM Full IR Analysis 2. D4S Nikon
7-07-2016 UFO Cylinder 3 SM WARP IR Analysis. D4 FSIR Nikon
7-07-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Full SM Analysis IR. D4 FSIR Nikon
3-17-2016 UFO Cylinder SM WARP IR Analysis. D4 FSIR Nikon
3-16-2016 UFO Cylinder 4 SM WARP SDM Analysis. D4 FSIR Nikon
1-06-2016 UFO Band of Light IR Flyby Analysis 2. D4S NIkon
Evidence from a second party source, a child onboard an aircraft filming out his window*
8-27-2015 UFO Green Beam SDM WARP SDM Analysis. D4S Nikon
1-10-2015 UFO 4 SM WARP Analysis. D4s Nikon
12-13-2014 UFO WARP SDM Analysis; this object is consistent with an anomaly imaged in AREA 51 Nevada and
Sedona Arizona. D4s Nikon
8-14-2014 UFO Green Beam WARP Multiphase Analysis. Filmed @ 50 FPS, the anomaly seemed to be in front and
behind itself, simultaneously. D4s Nikon
7-30-2014 UFO SM WARP SDM Portal 2 Analysis. D4s Nikon
5-12-2014 UFO Portal 1 SM WARP SDM Analysis. D4s Nikon
5-07-2014 UFO Portal 1 SM SDM Flyby Analysis. Constantly repeating and always in the same airspace and direction.
5-05-2014 UFO Portal 3 UFO WARP SDM Analysis. D4s Nikon
5-04-2014 UFO Portal 1 WARP Flyby Analysis. D4s Nikon
4-17-2014 UFO Portal 3 Analysis. D4s Nikon
4-13-2014 UFO Portal 7 UFO at WARP (Sudden Dematerialization). D4s Nikon
2-26-2014 Cylinder Enhanced. Files extracted from Time Lapse imagery*. D4s Nikon
2-22-2014 Cylinder 1 of 2 imaged moments apart from same POV airspace . D4s Nikon
2-22-2014 Cylinder 2 of 2 imaged moments apart from same POV airspace. D4s Nikon
1-25-2017 UFO Band of Light Flyby Analysis. D5 Nikon
Cylinder 12-11-2013 while filming for the Weather Channel. D4 Nikon
12-11-2013 Cylinder (in same airspace as the others). D4 Nikon
Cylinder 1 of 2, 11-25-2013. How extraordinary a sample of a nightly repeating multiple event. D4 Nikon
Cylinder 2 of 2, 11-25-2013 in exact POV as Cylinder 1, however; hours later. D4 Nikon
11-23-2013 Cylinder, was sub orbital (within cloud fields) during time of capture. This means it was inside
the layer of clouds as it was imaged. D4 Nikon
Cylinder 3 imaged 10-26-2013 is similar to an event imaged in Sedona Arizona 4-08-2013.
(Click on image for video). D4 Nikon
8-17-2013*, I have a multitude of examples, all which look exactly like this event frame extracted from
Time Lapse. D4 Nikon
8-13-2014 UFO Cylinder Green tail WARP Analysis. (Note the dates associated with these files*)
Am I documenting a Spatial Time Warp? Are these (8-17-2013*/8-13-2014) the same anomaly? 60 FPS D4S Nikon
8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis. There is no logical explanation for how an event can
repeat on the same day (each year). However; this data shows that events do repeat
(on the same day each year). D4S Nikon
8-15-2013 and the return of an unusual UFO anomaly. Even more, 2 like objects imaged in this stream of
video. D4 Nikon
8-03-2015 UFO Cylinder Green Beam WARP Sound Analysis.
The sound elements generally associated the the UFO or any object recorded under these conditions, is
missing. The camera is programmed to take 1 picture, every second for a programmed period of time.
Because DSLR digital video is limited to 20 minutes (30 on higher end cameras), the camera is unable to
record for extended periods. However an
extended duration can be recorded in Time Lapse mode using an intervalometer. This is a base application in
the advanced D series cameras by Nikon. (D4/D4s/D5)
11-18-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM WARP SDM Analysis. In a substantial number of these samples,
the UFO Band of Light emits a Nuclear Green Contrail. In all the examples, where applicable, the UFO
materializes into the given airspace, they do not fly into it, as you would assume a meteor does?
They are entering through portals that are connected to a much larger system, Wormhole. D5 Nikon
Cylinder 2 of 5 imaged 9-18-2013. D4 Nikon
Cylinder 9-02-2013 . On any given night, there may be several hits relative to this object. Registered in a
single frame, imaged at 1/60th of a second at F 1.4, using 102400 ISO. (Video stills) D4 Nikon
Cylinder 9-02-2013 shows the object at the same altitude as the cloud layer. D4 Nikon
Cylinder 8-31-2013 has the same angular vector as the "Golden" vector sample below. 2 objects imaged in
the same POV with exact angular/directional attributes. D4 Nikon
Cylinder UFO 8-04-2013 Enhanced. D4 Nikon
Cylinder event 3 imaged 8-02-2013. D4 Nikon
Click on image for Sedona Arizona video sample.
Cylinder 7-15-2013 Washington DC. D4 Nikon
Pocatello, Idaho 7-02-2013 (please go the the Sedona chapter of this research study)
Cylinder 6-24-2013 (1 of 3) Wayne Miller photograph. D90 Nikon
Cylinder UFO 6-20-2013. D4 Nikon
Cylinder 2 6-20-2013. D4 Nikon
5-17-2013 Cylinder. D4 Nikon
Cylinder 2, imaged 1 hour later that the first object, on 5-17-2013. D4 Nikon
Cylinder UFO# 1 of 2, 5-13-2013. D4 Nikon
Cylinder UFO imaged 2-17-2013. D4 Nikon
Cylinder 2-20-2013 from exactly the same POV as 2-17-2013. D4 Nikon
The Cylinder UFO
I am not one to take what cannot be confirmed and post it, however; this was sent to me from an associate
in Germany. In the illustration is a Cylinder-Cigar like object which is a 100% match to what I am presenting
in this forensic comparative analysis.
UFO - Cylinder Chased by Soviet MIG-21 Accelerates. Though this is Low Resolution footage, it shows an object
with a familiar configuration (Cigar Cylinder UFO). Estimated date of event, The (1950's).
NASA. Nikon D3S
La NASA filme des images d'un étrange ovni (sept 2015). NASA captured this anomaly long before I did,
however; my samples are Ultra HD with 60 fps frame rate and Sound in 7.1 DTS. Nikon D3S
It's obvious why this is referred to as a Cylinder/Cigar UFO, note the front and back of this anomaly.
The shape is indeed a Cigar. D4 Nikon
Everything is consistent. D4 Nikon
Mexican Cylinder Cigar UFO entering Popocatepetl Volcano reported by my associate Jaime Maussan.
The Cylinder Cigar shaped UFO is defined by its name, a Cylinder Cigar shaped craft. Shreveport Louisiana 11-01-2012. D4 Nikon
November 16, 2012, 15 days after my initial capture, this stunning video was filmed in Japan. The example is a 100%
match to Shreveport Louisiana 11-01-2012. D4 Nikon
The Nuclear Green contrail is associated to this objects propulsion matrix. It usually happens when the object first
materializes into the airspace, and then goes to Warp. (They don't fly into the airspace, they materialize into it).
Constantly updated materials (11-05-2016), provides a more comprehensive perspective relative to each UFO in this
case study. Each file contains the same kind of anomaly.
I will not dismiss the Secureteam's credibility based on my work. If this sample is fake, then so is the rest of my data on
this page, however; not. This sample is 100% consistent with the data on this page.
Portal Entry into our Airspace: The way in which ET enters our realm, is within the scope of Quantum Physics.
Radar can't detect what's not there, until it is there (physical manifestation). (They don't fly into the airspace; they
materialize into it). Along with the extraordinary materialization of this object are its unique sounds which were recorded
upon entry into the fixed pool of analysis (airspace). D4S NIkon
1-05-2017 UFO Cylinder SM SDM Full Tracker Analysis 1. Clearly we see this object incrementally materialize
into the airspace.It has a cylindrical shape defined by "round" medicine capsule front and rear definitions. D5 Nikon
The Cylinder flyby showed this object was in a curved trajectory (turning). Its a full flyby of the Cylinder UFO, captured
using Nikon D4S @ 60 fps. In this example, the UFO is maintaining a curved trajectory. (Its not flying straight). This quality
is not one of the properties or attributes of a naturally occurring phenomena such as a meteor. D4S Nikon
Cylinder exiting the airspace through known Spatial Portal (within the pool of analysis). D5 capture shows the
incremental dematerialization of this object upon entrance of the Portal.
Both this and the file above it, are within the same airspace (Pool of Analysis: PoA). We can conclude from the
frequency and types of events, that my PoA is a pathway to and from Portals. Probabilities associated to naturally
occurring events/ phenomena indicate that these samples are not naturally occurring, however; intelligently control
space craft with exceptional capabilities. D4S Nikon
The data associated with this Cylinder UFO is forensic. I have shown the possibilities associated with this UFO anomaly
with various levels of documentation. D4S Nikon
The various degrees of the anomaly includes directional variations, however most trajectories maintain consistency. D4S Nikon
The various degrees of the anomaly includes directional variations, as shown here. It's the same as the sample
above it, however; its flight trajectory is 180 degrees different than the first video sample showing the same
anomaly. D4S Nikon
The sample are quite specific, and easily categorized based on overall object (UFO) definitions. D4S Nikon
These 2 samples (below inclusive), are of the same object, however one is larger due to proximity to the lens. The
lens configurations preclude this technology from seeing outer atmosphere events. For outer atmosphere 400 mm
would be required. However, long lens do not have light gathering capabilities at greater than f/2.8. Light gathering
capabilities are diminish considerably in pure nocturnal environments, requiring light gathering abilities that can only
be achieved with a faster lens (f/1.4/1.8/2.0/2.8). Beyond these levels, in nocturnal environments, the lens is totally
useless unless used for duration imaging (Time Exposures). D4S Nikon
Each showing the same things under different time conditions, the area of analysis is relative (fixed). D4S Nikon
2 samples of a Cylinder UFO both coming and going, this sample going.. D4 FSIR Nikon
2 samples of a Cylinder UFO both coming and going, this sample coming.. both along the same yet opposite
trajectories. D4 FSIR Nikon
All samples are imaged in a fixed region of Geo-space, though space changes due to orbital rotations, the events are
all fixed geographically by the ground coordinates of the imaging systems.
Depending on the objects forwards velocity, some samples show what is the objects propulsion matrix contrail. Its
The Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail. D4 Nikon
The Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail. Proof is indeed in the pudding, with this extraordinary sample (IR) showing
the Nuclear Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail associated to the Cylinder UFO (Going to WARP).
Depending on the objects forwards velocity, the contrail is most apparent at maximum WARP* as shown in the
event documentation These samples do not meet the definition associated with a "Shooting Star".
Definition: a small, rapidly moving meteor burning up on entering the earth's atmosphere. These files do not meet
the definitions associated with a Shooting Star?
(They're not entering into the atmosphere; they're materializing into it) D5 Nikon
The propulsion systems onboard these craft must be Nuclear to achieve Quantum WARP (Teleportation) of the
entire craft and its occupants, through Space. The objects "materialize into the airspace", not "fly into it, as
a "Shooting Star". D4S Nikon
8-15-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Green Beam SM WARP SMD Analysis. (Note: This is an exact match to 8-14-2015) D5 Nikon
8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis. How is this possible? 2 exact samples, exactly 1 year apart and
essentially on the same date. Both samples show the exact same things! D4S Nikon
8-15-2013 and the return of an unusual UFO anomaly and its Nuclear Green contrail
These are repeating objects and events. Where indicated note the dates associated with each comparative (where
indicated) Is there a temporal anomaly associated with this region of Space known as my Pool of Analysis? How am
I imaging events with exactness, though on the same day on a different year? D4 Nikon
The example clearly shows the UFO anomaly materializing into the airspace. There is a distinctive difference in an object
that flies into the airspace as compared to an object which uses Quantum materialization to enter into the airspace. D4S Nikon
Matching objects and the frequencies associated with exact events, we can draw a conclusion from the plethora of
evidence obtained nightly from a fixed Pool of Analysis (90 degrees straight up over my roof 4 blocks from the White
House.) D4S Nikon
The size differentials may be attributed to the altitude relative to the anomaly at the time of capture. D4S Nikon
The possibility may also exist, that these objects do vary in size and displacement. That these smaller examples
may be scout ships (small Bands of Light). D4S Nikon
Consistencies associated to these samples, and the repeating levels of action within my fixed pool of analysis, have
demonstrated with certainty, the validity associated to UFOs and the truths associated to Spatial Anomalies (Portals)
as demonstrated by this sample, concludes a strong extraterrestrial presence within the Washington DC airspace. D4S Nikon
How they exit the airspace, especially when the exit portal is within the cloud layer which is fog like. The diffusion
associated with this event are clear indicators of altitude proximity. D4S Nikon
Well we know who most certainly is not truthful! If this ET did not exist, and I am in the same Airspace as the
White House, then how do I explain the work within this research? We voted these people into office!
Dr. Edgar Mitchell: Thank you Dear Friend-Rest in Peace 2-04-2016
To learn the methods I use to create these video/image files, go here:
Howard University Department of Art/School of Communications