The Band of Light UFO 2

A Forensic Comparative Analysis of a Large Beam of Light in the atmosphere

The Basis of Analysis:

Grumman 1960 B.jpg

Grumman Ground Satellite Tracking technology 3-08-1960. Grumman tracked and documented the anomaly using advanced film

technology in the 1960's. However; their interpretation of the data is incorrect:

The strange object was reported as result of a news story in the Argus-Leader saying a vapor trail or what resembled a large beam

of light in the atmosphere was reported over Sioux Falls and later much of the nation. There is no scientific explanation, as yet for

the object, which was reported traveling cast to west rather than on the west to east trajectory common to man-made satellites.

This Grumman example serves as the basis of analysis to this study. What's imaged is not a vapor trail, however; an extraterrestrial

craft, imaged below at 60 frames per second. The multiple examples ranging from 500nm-950nm IR, through Full Color Night Vision

at 60 fps. The multiple samples are comparative forensically. This also serves as an example of an erroneous analysis. What was

seen was not a vapor trail. A vapor trail does not have prolonged longevity, just as these samples cannot be meteors upon entry

into Earths atmosphere.

The Heart of the System

Solar Band of Light imaged by the Sun_000181

NASA Solar Observatory image sample

Nikon Cameras USANikon Professional Services USA

Nikon F5/F100/Cool Scan/D4 FSIR/D4S/D5/D5 FSIR Ultra HD 4K

Avid Media Composer 6.5

AVID Media Composer 8.8.1 64 Bit Digital Editing

BORIS FX

Boris Fx BCC 11

Technology used Nikon Lens 10 mm f/2.8, 16 mm f/2.8, 24 mm f/1.4, 50 mm f/1.4, 85 mm f/1.4, 180 mm f/2.8, 200 mm f/2.0: Close

Proximity lens. LifePixel IR Filters

Orion Telescopes 1000 mm f/3.9 Newtonian Reflector Celestron 2800-5600 mm f/10-f/2.0 Hyperstar

Band of Light UFO Falcon X Bangabandhu Satellite 1 Mission launch

Band of Light UFO Falcon X Bangabandhu Satellite 1 Mission launch.Now I hope this is closure to those that

think what I'm imaging are bugs that are back lighted. Bugs using a Newtonian reflector would be an impossibility?

What kind bugs exist in our upper atmosphere? The possibilities of bugs in the upper atmosphere is next to

nothing (impossible). The visibility of satellites 300-350 miles in orbit by a human on the ground: Impossible.

What they're seeing are inner atmospheric events. If you cannot tell me the tail number to a jumbo jet 40,000

feet up, how are you going to say you can see a satellite 300-350 miles away? (Impossible)

DSC_2018 UFO Band of Light closeup WARP SDM Analysis 2_000098

10-10-2016. D5 Nikon Events and anomalies which repeat with frequency suggests the possibilities of ET bases,

Portals, and cloaked mothership's are present within Washington DC Airspace. High speed captures (60 fps using

1/250th of a second shutter speed) reduces objective blurring generally associated with 24/50/100 FPS motion

pictures. Understanding the dynamics of the samples, reduces the possibilities of erroneous statements unless that

person is "limited in scope and intelligence"?

12045795_10153279874739195_2197998550090982286_o.jpg

Supportive Evidence from a second party source; a child onboard an aircraft filming out his seat window* Its a day time example

and filmed with a cellphone camera. Though more than likely taken with an i-Phone (phone of choice for children), the sample

provides sufficient proof, and validates evidence taken with advanced camera systems Nikon (D4/D4s/D5). My samples are all

primarily 60 frames per second. Prolonged exposures are impossible at high frame rates. Because these samples are 60 FPS,

the minimal shutter speed that can be used is 1/60th of a second. Due to the high ISO used to record the events, I am able to

increase my shutter speeds to 1/250th of a second (before video noise). Understanding High ISO means more granular

distortion (noise), requiring VNR (Video Noise Reduction). For this I use Boris Fx

D5U_2155 UFO Band of Light FB Analysis_000078

10-14-2016. D5 Nikon @ 60 fps. Again note the dates in association with these events. This example shows the

Band of Light UFO in extreme close proximity. It's my estimation that this particular anomaly is 5-6 aircraft carriers

in length.

12-25-2016 UFO Band of Light WARP SDM Analysis

12-25-2016 UFO Band of Light WARP SDM Analysis. The variations in length could also indicate proximity to

the camera or substantial variations in size, or both. The worlds first forensic comparative analysis based on

exact evidence. Each object is exactly alike, however in variations of length. I and an associate, Ken Ballos RIP

witnessed this anomaly in Richmond Virginia, as it flew above our heads in his front yard. Based on my research

This is indeed an Extraterrestrial Spacecraft, not the result of a slow frame rate and shutter speeds. D5 Nikon

using 1/250th of a second shutter speed and 60 frames per second frame rate, as base standards in 90% of the

videos in this analysis. These standards are not known for blurring.

8-03-2015 UFO Cylinder Green Beam WARP Sound Analysis

8-03-2015 UFO Cylinder Green Beam WARP Sound Analysis. The Sound Elements generally associated the the UFO

or any object recorded under these conditions, are missing. The camera is programmed to take 1 picture, every second

for a programmed period of time. Because DSLR digital video is limited to 20 minutes (30 on higher end cameras),

the camera is unable to record for extended periods. However an extended duration can be recorded in Time Lapse

mode using an intervalometer. This is a base application in the advanced D series cameras by Nikon. (D4/D4s/D5)

How do I show you events all within the months of August (2012-2017), and show you exactness in events, yet 365 days separation?

There are files that are exactly the same.*

1-01-2018 UFO Band of Light SM WARP SDM Analysis

1-01-2018 UFO Band of Light SM WARP SDM Analysis. This anomaly has a plethora of data representation. The Band of Light

UFO was first documented by Grumman 3-08-1960

8-13-2014 UFO Cylinder Green tail WARP Sound Analysis

8-13-2014 UFO Cylinder Green tail WARP Sound Analysis. There were Sounds associated to this event, and the camera recorded

them. Sound generated by anomaly is 100% consistent with sounds generated by a similar object recorded 5-04-2014 in the same

airspace. The sounds recorded are unlike anything anybody has ever heard? The sounds are emitted from the UFOs as they pass

through the image frames.

8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis

8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis. Note the trajectories of the samples are all consistent. How is this possible?

8-15-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Green Beam SM WARP SMD Analysis

8-15-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Green Beam SM WARP SMD Analysis. (Note: This is an exact match to 8-14-2015)

8-01-2017 UFO Cylinder SDM Analysis

8-01-2017 UFO Cylinder SDM Analysis. The samples are all within my fixed pool of analysis. The camera for 5 years, never

deviated from its POV other than (camera/lens) configurations. Each on the same month however on different years. Each with

the same trajectory, overall luminosity, and nuclear green contrail. Some have sound associations:

5-08-2018 Band of Light FB 1000 mm U-IR Analysis

5-08-2018 Band of Light FB 1000 mm U-IR Analysis (Ultra HD 4K). This object entered the airspace modulating colors. However;

we're looking at Hyper Infrared (ISO 409600) through a Newtonian Reflector f/3.9. I'll soon have Hyperstar Celestron EdgeHD 1100

online @ f/2.0 (TBA). The modulating object was reminiscent of the file captured in the desert of Sedona below.

Sedona AZ drop camera sequence showing object warp into frame and slow down in Sedona Nevada 10-26-2012

20 mm lens perspective of an object which dropped out of WARP, while I was filming in the Sedona Desert. This anomaly was

featured in Uncovering Aliens (BBC-Discovery Networks)

UncoveringAliens

I am Proud to be a cast member (in my series in Sedona) to Uncovering Aliens on Discovery's Animal Planet/

Discovery Science/American Heroes (click to Enter)

This version of Uncovering Aliens is enhanced with actual HD digital footage. It may not be advisable for children*

Sunday 12-15-2013 @ 11 PM EST on Animal Planet

The timeline is reversed. My current data is at the top of the page, and time flows backwards. The actual beginning

is all the way at the bottom of this page, in the film category. My initial captures are film (RMOS) based technology.

RMOS (retired) was my film lab technology which used low voltage radiation to process color film. This work is the

direct result of Alien contact in the UK as a child.

Uncovering Aliens BLACK OPS CONSPIRACY  UFO Sedona AZ 4 07 2013 Analysis 2 Pt1

Footage. Dr. Mitchell described the object as massive! This event is 100% consistent with what my advanced imaging systems

are documenting. Second contact was most abstract! I had just climbed a mountain with 60 lbs of equipment on my back. When

I got to the top, my body was destroyed. I returned to the hotel in extreme pain, my body was destroyed by the climb. HOwever;

in my sleep I received a command to wake up (telepathically) When I arose, the pain to my body was completely gone? I was

asked to setup my camera behind my hotel room door, as instructed, I did. 2 minutes after hitting start, the object materialized

into the video (above). It gave me 2 commands, 2 locations, virtually the same, however; one showing the object entering and

the other showing it exit the Sedona Airspace. Time Lapse requires a frame rate to play on video players , in using 30 fps as

my frame rate. (above and below). Each video is processed in AVID Media Composer using DNxHD 145-200 AVID workflow.

Pale Band of Light UFO in Sedona Arizona airspace

Within my pool of analysis, I was able to document conditions in which these objects appear and disappear, with higher definition

than NASA's initial documentation onboard MIR in thee 1990's.. How ET Enters Our Airspace Many had problems associated with

these time lapse images, suggesting that I extended the duration of the exposure to get these samples? However; that's a feeble

notion and does not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Video taken at 60 fps has a base shutter speed of 1/60th of a second.

11-05-2016 UFO Band of Light 3 SM WARP Analysis

11-05-2016 UFO Band of Light 3 SM WARP Analysis. D5 Nikon

Unknown Objects during Orion Nebula Capture

Unknown Objects during Orion Capture. Another second party example verifying samples presented in this Washington DC Final

Analysis. We are going Deep Space with a 10" reflector and superior imaging (motion picture) technology. These files forensically

authenticate the data presented here. Those that claim my work to be fraudulent, are indeed clueless and under educated. Only

those that know not, would say the samples here are the results of extended exposures?

5-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 1000mm H-FSIR FB Analysis

5-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 1000mm H-FSIR FB Analysis. This anomaly and event would have been invisible to human eyes. Its

a closer example of 5-08-2018 Band of Light FB 1000 mm U-IR Analysis (Ultra HD 4K). (above)

5-08-2018 Band of Light 2 1000mm H-FSIR FB Analysis

5-08-2018 Band of Light 2 1000mm H-FSIR FB Analysis. This event is a matter of seconds (20-30) prior to the event imaged

before this. (above). Though IR, the anomaly is in Transient WARP.

8-22-2017 UFO Band of Light Cloaked SM WARP Analysis

8-22-2017 UFO Band of Light Cloaked SM WARP Analysis. Though it is somewhat visible, the question is, is it in a solid state as

it passes through the frame? My samples show these objects as solid masses, thoroughly visible. Though the possibility that this

visibility may be attributed to extreme High ISO (102400-ISO 204800) associated with the settings during capture. The exactness

associated with the exposures indicates these objects suggests the objects vary their intensities, for specific reasons.the anomaly

is in Transient WARP.

5-10-2018 UFO Band of Light SM WARP H-FSIR Analysis 3

5-10-2018 UFO Band of Light SM WARP H-FSIR Analysis 3

5-10-2018 Luminosity with Band of Light SM SDM H-FSIR Analysis

5-10-2018 Luminosity with Band of Light SM SDM H-FSIR Analysis

5-11-2018 UFO Band of Light FB Hyper IR Analysis

5-11-2018 UFO Band of Light FB Hyper IR Analysis

5-11-2018 Band of Light 3 FB H-FSIR Analysis

5-11-2018 Band of Light 3 FB H-FSIR Analysis

The phase of research involves High speed scans of the Lunar surface. Because there is extreme luminosity, I am using extreme

shutter speeds (1/8000th of a second shutter speed). The point is to freeze action, with minimal blurring. Unless of course something

is moving at a velocity which exceeds the shutter speed used. Lunar surface scan magnification will increase, as I progress into this

study.

There were several types of Band of Light UFOs imaged during this continuing research study. The longer, larger craft imaged above,

and the smaller, more consistent Band of Light which is single aircraft carrier in size verses the longer ones above which are 3-6

carriers in length.

Shreveport, Louisiana 11-01-2012

NGM reference file (Click on image). Please note Metadata section of page. Shreveport, Louisiana 11-01-2012. In a 550 frame

sequence taken at 00:41:45 AM, we have 1 frame which shows a luminous object and contrail, as it ascends into Shreveport.

Atmospheric conditions in Shreveport are poor. There is excessive light and air pollution in this immediate area. I matched this

frame sample to video footage taken in Japan 11-15-2012. Shreveport LA. How was Japan able to get the exact same visual

sample as Shreveport? This question is answered within this analysis. The objects obtained within the (FPOA), are a clear

indication. This energy based spacecraft has been documented by NASA, and Grumman as early as 1960 (Grumman) below.

A 100% match to the anomaly I imaged in Shreveport LA

This study begins after returning from filming "My Big Redneck Vacation" in AREA 51 Nevada and Sedona Arizona. I had several

very unusual documented experiences in AREA 51 and Sedona which made several things quite clear: Extraterrestrials are using

Spatial Portals (Stargates) to enter and exit our airspace. Within my Fixed Pool of Analysis I have documented all the possibilities

associated with the appearance and disappearance of anomalous objects within our airspace.

The technology used for nocturnal cinematography requires no lights to operate. There are no light sources at the POV or in

my fixed pool of analysis (now concluded). Note this Japanese sample and the sample from Shreveport 15 days earlier. They

both have the exact same look, and trajectory, spite being taken from 2 different locations, thousands of miles apart..

7-09-2017 UFO Band of Light SM FB Analysis

7-09-2017 UFO Band of Light SM FB Analysis. A clear example of an object that suddenly appears into the airspace. "The way

in which the appearance and disappearance of UFOs taking place in our atmosphere" In an obviously clear sample, this object

appears from out of nowhere? Clearly indicating the validity of a Spatial Anomaly: Portal within my fixed pool of analysis. Objects

appear initially stationary, however; examples such as the following, shows motion associated with the objects manifestation into

this realm. It appears 100% stationary, and then goes to WARP. 1990. :"At this time, without a doubt, the Americans already knew

very well, the way in which the appearance and disappearance of the UFOs taking place in the atmosphere of our planet" (1990). 

8-23-2017 UFO Cylinder SM WARP SDM Analysis

8-23-2017 UFO Cylinder SM WARP SDM Analysis. With a plethora of data, all gathered within a fixed geospatial region (90 degrees)

above my POV, 4 blocks from the White House. The Obama Administration did not view ET or UFO's as a reality or threat? They did

not view any of this, as a reality? Sharing the White House Airspace, and capturing constant events all within my fixed pool of analysis,

I can conclude that the Obama administrations views relative to these events were not intelligently based? I will use a term Obama used

to describe our current President Donald Trump, as that which clearly defines President Obama: "A Bullshit Artist". I was convinced of

this by his (Obama) interpretations associated with AREA 51 Nevada

10-21-2016 UFO Band of Light 2 Tracker Full Analysis

10-21-2016 UFO Band of Light 2 Tracker Full Analysis. D5 Nikon. The definitions in which shooting star applies:

"a visual meteor appearing as a temporary streak of light in the night sky", does not apply in these examples. The

anomaly in this video is not temporarily displaying luminosity, or forwards trajectory. It's luminous qualities and

forwards trajectory are constant and consistent throughout this 60 fps example. Filmed using 1/250th of a second

shutter speed, there is a reduced a significantly reduced chance that these are the results of prolonged exposures

or shutter speeds (at 60 frames per second). 100% relative throughout the entire sequence.

12-28-2017 UFO Band of Light Flyby Analysis

12-28-2017 UFO Band of Light Flyby Analysis. A matching file to 10-21-2016 (above).

8-21-2017 UFO Band of Light SM Cloud WARP Analysis

8-21-2017 UFO Band of Light SM Cloud WARP Analysis. This event is beneath the cloud ceiling. The limited diffusion associated

with proximity to cloud matter, suggests this object is at the threshold of the cloud ceiling. Diffusion occurs when an extreme light

source is introduced to cloud mass (fog like) materials, causing a glow effect. MUFON identified these samples as bugs illuminated

by back light? MUFON is not a scientific organization, however a group of individuals which pay $4.99 a month to say they are UFO

investigators? They have minimal, if any, scientific expertise. It is apparent on their website. My research is not associated with

MUFON. For any analysis relative to this material, I use Dr. Bruce Maccabee.

8-20-2017 UFO Band of Light 2 SM WARP Tracker Analysis B.jpg

8-20-2017 UFO Band of Light #2 SM WARP Tracker Analysis. Again an example of repeating events within my fixed pool of analysis.

Events transpiring within a fixed pool of analysis, constantly, is an indicator of the claims associated with Spatial Portals.

Skywatching with NightVision scope (2nd partry example)

Skywatching with Night Vision scope (2nd party example), clearly shows the anomalies I get regularly from my Fixed Pool of

Analysis. It seems the bullshit artist are tongue tied, when it comes to facts they cannot possibly understand? Yet they push

forwards as something they are not (Qualified educationally or scientifically). Then why go forth as an expert when you are

clueless (MUFON)? Somebody always has something to say, even if it is absolutely moronic? MUFON is not the place to send

your materials.

8-06-2017 UFO Band Of Light 3 SM WARP SDM Analysis

8-06-2017 UFO Band Of Light 3 SM WARP SDM Analysis. Note the anomalies are exactly the same, 8-09-2-17 is exactly the

same however with a different trajectory

8-09-2017 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

8-09-2017 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis. These are the same object, however on different days. Such as the 11-26-2016

UFO Cylinder and 10-13-2016 which to is a 100% match to 8-06-2017 and 11-26-2016. All imaged in the exact same relative

airspace (FPOA)

11-26-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

11-26-2016 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM SDM Analysis. In some cases such as this, it's obvious, this object is

within close proximity, however an erie match to the anomaly which destroyed the Russian Phobos 2. This forensic

match is imaged in P-53 Restricted Airspace (The White House). This is clearly associated with a Spatial Portal. The

anomaly incrementally materializes into the airspace. D5 Nikon

D5U_2126 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Analysis_000136

10-13-2016 Click on image for video. Nikon D5. Several files that are exactly the same, all within the same region

of space (FPOA).

6-27-2017 UFO Band of Light FB Tracker Analysis

6-27-2017 UFO Band of Light FB Tracker Analysis (FPOA)

11-22-2017 UFO Band of Light 5 SM WARP Analysis

11-22-2017 UFO Band of Light 5 SM WARP Analysis, the 5th of 7 events.

11-22-2017 UFO Band of Light 6 SM WARP Analysis

11-22-2017 UFO Band of Light 6 SM WARP Analysis, the sixth of 7 events within a FPA.

12-24-2017 UFO Cylinder 2 SM WARP SDM Analysis

12-24-2017 UFO Cylinder 2 SM WARP SDM Analysis

12-24-2017 UFO Band of Light 2 Infrared FB Analysis

12-24-2017 UFO Band of Light 2 Infrared FB Analysis

12-26-2017 UFO Band of Light  SM SDM IR Analysis 2 Motion Tracking

12-26-2017 UFO Band of Light SM SDM IR Analysis 2 Motion Tracking

12-27-2017 Cylinder Band of Light SM WARP FB Analysis 2

12-27-2017 Cylinder Band of Light SM WARP FB Analysis 2

12-31-2017 UFO Band of Light Portal Entry Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Band of Light Portal Entry Analysis. Clearly we see this anomaly enter the airspace through what appears to be

a Spatial Portal

12-31-2017 UFO Band of Light SM Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Band of Light SM Analysis. The trajectory similar to that of the file above this. These are not meteors, and as

you can see, it materializes into the airspace, not fly into it as a meteor would.

12-31-2017 UFO Cylinder 1 SM WARP Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Cylinder 1 SM WARP Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Cylinder 2 SM WARP Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Cylinder 2 SM WARP Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Cylinder 3 SM SDM Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Cylinder 3 SM SDM Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Band of Light SM WARP Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Band of Light SM WARP SDM Analysis

12-31-2017 UFO Band of Light SM WARP SDM Analysis

1-02-2018 UFO Band of Light with Green contrail Tracker Analysis 2

1-02-2018 UFO Band of Light with Green contrail Tracker Analysis 2

1-15-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

1-15-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

1-15-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 in Clouds FB Tracker Analysis

1-15-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 in Clouds FB Tracker Analysis

1-15-2018 Cylinder Band of Light Dual Capture FSIR-FCNV

 

1-15-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Tracker IR Analysis

1-18-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

1-18-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

1-18-2018 UFO Cylinder 2 SM Portal FB SDM Analysis

1-18-2018 UFO Cylinder 2 SM Portal FB SDM Analysis

1-20-2018 UFO Cylinder Teardrop Anomaly SM SDM Analysis

1-20-2018 UFO Cylinder Teardrop Anomaly SM SDM Analysis

1-20-2018 UFO Band of Light Green Beam Analysis

1-20-2018 UFO Band of Light Green Beam Analysis

1-21-2018 UFO Band of Light SM Portal SDM Analysis

1-21-2018 UFO Band of Light SM Portal SDM Analysis

2-15-2018 UFO Band of Light Portal Entry Analysis

2-15-2018 UFO Band of Light Portal Entry Analysis. The path in which an object enters and exits our realm, incrementally. This

object does not fly into the airspace, however manifests as to appear through a gateway, door, a portal into this world.

2-18-2018 UFO Cylinder SDM Analysis

2-18-2018 UFO Cylinder SDM Analysis

2-26-2018 Band of Light UFO SDM Analysis

2-26-2018 Band of Light 1 UFO SDM Analysis

2-26-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 FB Analysis

2-26-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 FB Analysis

3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 1 SM FB SDM IR Analysis

3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 1 SM FB SDM IR Analysis

3-08-2018 Teardrop Luminosity and Band of Light UFO SM SDM Analysis

3-08-2018 Teardrop Luminosity and Band of Light UFO SM SDM Analysis

3-08-2018 Teardrop SM SDM Analysis

3-08-2018 Teardrop SM SDM Analysis

3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 1 SM FB SDM IR Analysis

3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 1 SM FB SDM IR Analysis

3-08-2018 Slow moving luminosity 50 minutes FB Time compressed

3-08-2018 Slow moving luminosity 50 minutes FB Time compressed. Note this time compressed sample includes the Band of Light

that is shown directly above this sample. 3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 1 SM FB SDM IR Analysis

3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 SM FB IR Analysis

3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 SM FB IR Analysis

3-15-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SDM Analysis

3-15-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SDM Analysis

3-15-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light 2 SDM Analysis

3-15-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light 2 SDM Analysis

3-08-2018 Slow moving luminosity 50 minutes FB Time compressed

3-08-2018 Slow moving luminosity 50 minutes FB Time compressed. Note this time compressed sample includes the Band of Light

that is shown directly above this sample. 3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 1 SM FB SDM IR Analysis

3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 SM FB IR Analysis

3-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 SM FB IR Analysis

3-15-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SDM Analysis

3-15-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SDM Analysis

3-15-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light 2 SDM Analysis

3-15-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light 2 SDM Analysis

3-23-2018 UFO Cylinder SDM Analysis

3-23-2018 UFO Cylinder SDM Analysis

3-23-2018 UFO Band of Light Entry Exit Portal

3-23-2018 UFO Band of Light Entry Exit Portal

4-11-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

4-11-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

4-12-2018 UFO Band of Light 1 FB Analysis 2

4-12-2018 UFO Band of Light 1 FB Analysis 2

4-12-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 Full FB Analysis

4-12-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 Full FB Analysis

4-13-2018 UFO Band of Light FCNV FSIR Dual Hyper Camera Capture

4-13-2018 UFO Band of Light FCNV FSIR Dual Hyper Camera Capture. This is a First: A 2 camera Hyper imaging system: Nikon D5

Full Color Night Vision (FCNV) along with Hybrid Nikon D5 Full Spectrum Infrared using Visible Bandpass IR filter (Near IR) dual capture

of a Band of Light UFO prior to Portal Entry/Exit. Hyper Color Infrared is relatively new, however Hyper IR Nikon D5 is in a league of its

own! These are basic tests of tandem imaging systems. Both cameras captured amazing results, however; it's what comes next that

blows a hole in it all.

4-15-2018 UFO Band of Light SM FB HCIR Analysis

4-15-2018 UFO Band of Light SM FB HCIR Analysis. Another First: Hyper Color Infrared UFO capture using Hybrid Nikon D5 IR.

4-18-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

4-18-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM Analysis

4-20-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM HCIR Analysis

4-20-2018 UFO Band of Light SM SDM HCIR Analysis. This object appears stationary, and vanishes immediately after. It is not in

motion as it manifested into the airspace.

4-20-2018 Band of Light FCNV-FSIR Dual Camera Capture

4-20-2018 Band of Light FCNV-FSIR Dual Camera Capture

4-21-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM HCIR FCNV Analysis

4-21-2018 UFO Cylinder Band of Light SM HCIR FCNV Analysis. I have matching systems. Each camera is mounted with a 50 mm

f/1.4 lens, exposures and camera settings are matched. Cameras are aligned allowing for exact captures (FCNV/FSIR) during events.

4-21-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 SM FB HCIR FCNV Analysis

4-21-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 SM FB HCIR FCNV Analysis

4-29-2018 UFO Band of Light SM FB SDM HCIR FCNV Analysis

4-29-2018 UFO Band of Light SM FB SDM HCIR FCNV Analysis. (Dual Hyper Camera capture*).

5-08-2018 Band of Light FB 1000 mm U-IR Analysis

5-08-2018 Band of Light FB 1000 mm U-IR Analysis (Ultra HD 4K). This object entered the airspace modulating colors. However;

we're looking at Hyper Infrared (ISO 409600) through a Newtonian Reflector f/3.9. I'll soon have Hyperstar Celestron EdgeHD 1100

online @ f/2.0 (TBA).

5-10-2018 Luminosity with Band of Light SM SDM H-FSIR Analysis

5-10-2018 Luminosity with Band of Light SM SDM H-FSIR Analysis

5-23-2018 UFO Band of Light FB H FSIR Analysis

5-23-2018 UFO Band of Light FB H FSIR Analysis

5-24-2018 UFO Band of Light SM Hyperstar IR

5-24-2018 UFO Band of Light SM Hyperstar EdgeHD1100 f/2.0 IR

5-24-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 FB H IR Hyperstar Analysis

5-24-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 FB H IR Hyperstar Analysis

6-05-2018 UFO Band of Light WARP FB H-FSIR Hyperstar Analysis

6-05-2018 UFO Band of Light WARP FB H-FSIR Hyperstar Analysis

6-08-2018 UFO Band of Light Portal Entry Hyperstar IR Analysis

6-08-2018 UFO Band of Light Portal Entry Hyperstar IR Analysis

6-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 SM WARP SDM Hyperstar IR Analysis

6-08-2018 UFO Band of Light 2 SM WARP SDM Hyperstar IR Analysis

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light 3 WARP Flyby Hyperstar IR Analysis

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light 3 WARP Flyby Hyperstar IR Analysis. Filmed using Hyperstar 650

mm f/2.0 lens. With a plethora of data relative to this event/object in Ultra HD Hyper Full Spectrum

Infrared.

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light 3 WARP Flyby Hyperstar IR Analysis B

Whatever this anomaly is, its absolutely extraordinary. However; lets again take a look at the 3-08-1969 Grumman

Report: Grumman 3-08-1960

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light 3 WARP Flyby Hyperstar IR Analysis C.jpg

Enhanced analysis (Solarization) applied to original image sample.

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light UFO WARP Analysis 2 Vertical Perspective

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light UFO WARP Analysis 2 Vertical Perspective. Taking the original DNxHD 200 file

into Autodesk 3dsmax2018, applying Virtual Camera technology into my DNxHD 200 environment, I can refilm the

event in a Horizontal perspective, with 0% degradation DNXHD 200 Avid/Boris workflow. Looking a bit closer and in

Ultra HD 4K definition.

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light 3 WARP Flyby Hyperstar IR Analysis E

The energy field associated with this anomaly is off the charts. To examine it , the image frame was

repositioned horizontally. I've never seen anything with these properties? Filmed using Hyperstar 650

mm f/2.0 lens. With a plethora of data relative to this event/object in Ultra HD Hyper Full Spectrum

Infrared. Its good to have High Definition files for visual analysis. We know this cannot be an artifact

associated with the camera (Nikon D5 Full Spectrum Infrared). I'm focusing on more definitive variations

in analysis. Looking closer into the Grumman 1960's data, and the physical descriptions associated with

the anomaly documented by Grumman's ground tracking technology:

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light 3 WARP Flyby Hyperstar IR Analysis D.jpg

An close-up analysis shows the energy fields differential associated to this anomaly (UFO Band of Light).

The energy field associated with this anomaly is off the charts. To examine it , the image frame was

repositioned horizontally and Solarization is applied to the sample.

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light 3 WARP Flyby Hyperstar IR Analysis F.jpg

Modifying the color saturation, we get more detail in association the the energy fields around this anomaly.

I returned to the file, and placed a virtual camera in the vertical perspective.

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light UFO WARP Analysis 2 Vertical Perspective. Taking the original DNxHD 200 file

into Autodesk 3dsmax2018, applying Virtual Camera technology into my DNxHD 200 environment, I can refilm the

event in a Horizontal perspective, with 0% degradation DNXHD 200 Avid/Boris workflow. Looking a bit closer and in

Ultra HD 4K definition. The enhanced sample shows a much higher contrast rendition of the event. In the higher

contrast analysis, we can see distinctive differences in the objects color temperatures at the very tip; shaped

like a straight pin, used for sewing.

 

 

MYSTERIOUS REDDISH OBJECT  CIRCLING EARTH PHOTOGRAPHED

A mysterious reddish object circling the earth that presumedly left what appeared to be a large vapor trail over

Sioux Falls has been photographed by a tracking camera of the Grumman Aviation Engineer Corp. at Bethpage, N.Y.

(However: This interpretation is totally incorrect, based on current Ultra HD video documentation)

Grumman, The Associated Press reported, said the photograph was taken by a special tracking crew which has

been on watch.

6-08-2018 UFO Red Band of Light 3 WARP Flyby Hyperstar IR Analysis E

The strange object was reported as result of a news story in the Argus-Leader saying a vapor trail or what

resembled a large beam of light in the atmosphere was reported over .Sioux Falls and later much of the nation.

There is no scientific explanation as yet for the object, which was reported traveling cast to west rather than

on the west to east trajectory common to man-made satellites.

 

The object appears to be about a tenth the size of the Echo I balloon satellite and traveling about twice as fast.

The Adler Planetarium of Chicago is compiling data on the object and says it doesn't appear to be an artificial

satellite or a meteor.

Modifying the color saturation, we get more detail in association the the energy fields around this anomaly.

6-14-2018 UFO Band of Light WARP FB Hyperstar Analysis

6-14-2018 UFO Band of Light WARP FB Hyperstar Analysis

6-14-2018 UFO Band Of Light SM WARP SDM Hyperstar IR Analysis

6-14-2018 UFO Band Of Light SM WARP SDM Hyperstar IR Analysis

6-14-2018 Band of Light 3 SM FB Hyperstar Analysis

6-14-2018 Band of Light 3 SM FB Hyperstar Analysis

6-14-2018 UFO Band of Light 5 Portal SDM Hyperstar Analysis

6-14-2018 UFO Band of Light 5 Portal SDM Hyperstar Analysis. This event was reminiscent of something

imaged in Sedona AZ while filming: Uncovering Aliens.

Pale Band of Light UFO in Sedona Arizona airspace

Within my pool of analysis, I was able to document conditions in which these objects appear and disappear, with higher definition

than NASA's initial documentation onboard MIR in thee 1990's.. How ET Enters Our Airspace Many had problems associated with

these time lapse images, suggesting that I extended the duration of the exposure to get these samples? However; that's a feeble

notion and does not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Video taken at 60 fps has a base shutter speed of 1/60th of a second.

Solar Band of Light imaged by the Sun_000181

NASA Solar Observatory image sample