Analysis by Paul Hill and Luke Ford. However; what's not discussed are the random differences in color generated

by these highly unusual spacecraft.

Featured UFO files: What we capture is truly spectacular! This is not make believe!

UFO Flyby POV Washington DC 4-26-2013 AVID Boris FX BCC Vr2. A more extensive analysis of this extraordinary

Luminous Orange anomaly (UFO)

Partial UFO definitions captured by UFOdc cameras. D700-D7000 Nikon at 20000 ISO. Advanced conventional

camera technology capturing UFO anomalies. The times have changed, and imaged events, especially at much

higher ISO's (102400-204800 ISO), are far more difficult to debunk by the "so called experts"`, that called my

samples lens flares? To make a lens flare call, make sure you understand what a lens flare is, and the

differences generated by refraction which tends to reflections in a lens.

The absorption of energy from Storm events

Faraday's law of induction is a basic law of electromagnetism predicting how a magnetic field will interact with

an electric circuit to produce anelectromotive force (EMF). It is the fundamental operating principle of

 transformers, inductors, and many types of electrical motors, generators andsolenoids.[4][5]

UFO's draw energy from organic sources, much like an induction charge. A refueling station of organic origins on our

planet. This is an animation using 3dsmax technology, along with UFO Colors: Extraterrestrial Color Texture Bitmaps.

Orange and Blue Spheres landing in Baltimore Maryland 8-03-2008

Sphere takeoff, Baltimore Maryland 8-03-2008. Spheres are not uncommon, however; their origins are? Brandon's

sample, showed much more than meets the eye. I examined his footage; and from my analysis, deemed his footage

extraordinary! I was immediately sold not just at the UFO that is clearly imaged, however by the Tornado in the

background. Plasma projection UFO.

November 17, 2013 Crazy UFO over Noblesville Indiana! It was EXTREMELY windy (tornados about 8 or so miles away!)

and this thing was just zipping around like it was nothing! What is it? Brandon's video showed the conditions in which a

conventional object such as a balloon, would not be able to offset the forces of a tornado? His UFO footage shows a

sphere which is unaffected by the forces generated by a tornado in November*. Tornado's in November are an absolute

anomaly. Weather conditions conducive to the events related to tornadoes are way out of season in November! Could

the UFO be the cause of the storm, or is it absorbing energy, inductively (induction)?

We set forth to examine these theories. Spheres and the Challenger Disaster.

Spheres: Mount Vernon New York and an extraordinary video by photographer: Melvin Harris. Obviously not a balloon, however

a Sphere in its natural state. I've shown through examples, sphere based UFOs which are exactly the same, however; powered

differently at that moment. This pearl white sphere, can assume many colors, some of which it can randomly modulate. My 2002

US Capitol Close Encounter involved luminous Spheres. The formation of 4 Green luminous spheres, 2 of which modulated

variations of Green, the other 2 modulated Green, Red, Amber, Blue, and Ultraviolet. The abilities of a UFO, to be able to

move in and out of a storm, unaffected by the storms overall energy, is an issue worthy of discussion, however, is exactly

what is shown in Brandon's video.

Noblesville later in the evening, UFO documentation site. Like criminals, aliens have a tenancy to return to the scene of the crime.

When your tagged, your a member for life! My encounters have been absolutely extraordinary. This evening was no different! We

set forth to our next location, an area known for Tornado action, and the area of one of my most profound UFO documented

encounters!

National Geographic reference file*, please click on image.

UFO Hunt remote drop location. What are the possibilities a UFO will streak by silently? 1 million to 1 that an event would transpire

from such randomness in time and location? If not for the film documented by the camera, this story would be unbelievable!

Kokomo Indiana. Grissom Air Force Base is the red beacon above the trees. The UFO passed at high velocity, this base during

our field investigation.

Composite of random frames (3) of several taken, from this head on UFO flyby! The camera imaged several conventional

commercial and military aircraft, however; none moved at this velocity! Even more abstract was the silence of the object as it

streaked by? Time differential can be calculated by the positioning of the stars.

I found this single frame quite odd? From the perspective of the craft, the "green side" of an aircraft (right), red side of an aircraft (left).

Yet this sample shows red on the green side of this UFO! Upon closer analysis of the frames imaged of this objects onwards flight

trajectory, that this object zig-zagged in flight, not maintaining an even, straight line flight trajectory. I concluded this based on angular

trajectories of each frame in the imaged sequence. This is the only reference of color (red) in the imaged samples captured of this

UFO. Looking closely at the sample we see the contrail has a jagged edge associated to it. It's zig-zagging in its forwards flight vectoring.

Basing my arguments on this singular frame showing Red light from the Green side of the aircraft, according to law (Aviation lights)

I looked further into my documentation, at the imaged frame samples. An UFO that streaks by while in what was thought to be

straight forwards flight, is not. Using the objects contrail as a reference line, I tried to connect the random "dots", however could

not? The angular trajectory of the contrail in each frame, was different? An object moving in a calculated trajectory, would not

deviate from that flight path or do so randomly modulating left and right? Generally, the flight path of an aircraft is a straight line.

Zig-zagging isn't something normally done in flight. I used the objects extended contrail, as it passed the field of focus in the

camera, as a point of analysis in creating the second composite above, and below. The above sample, referenced at its exit

point in the frame, showed the objects oscillation pattern.

UFO Composite 2B. An object in a straight trajectory, would not be fanning, as this sample clearly indicates. If this object based

while in straight forwards flight, the contrails would line up and match in each individual sample. They would match because the

flight trajectory maintains forwards flight consistency. If it was moving in a straight line, each contrail sample would lineup in sync

however; it does not in this sample. It shows the object constantly deviate zig-zagged throughout its forwards flight trajectory, in

line with the frame of the stationary drop camera in this expedition.(Fanning contrail). Further analysis of this event, rules out

some elements of my theories on the flight trajectory of this UFO. Though its contrail shows what appears to be a jagged tail,

I assumed it was zig-zagging. Looking at the video stream, that is what it "appears" to be doing, however; it is not! I do attempt

to look at all possibilities before saying an object which could be conventional, is a UFO. To make such a claim without looking

further into possibilities, could make an absolute fool or utter idiot out of me? I chose not to open the gates of wrath, by making

claims which cannot be supported by tangible evidence.

Flight path trajectory analysis. Based on crew observations*, this object did not have rocket engine noise associated to it.

*I programmed an autonomous shoot; allowing the camera to document the events as they transpired over the course of

the 50 minutes, this sequence represents. The lack of noise, rules out Scramjet technology. I initially thought the possibilities

would tend towards that which is known, however; this does not conform to the definitions associated to Scramjet. A report

consistent with this, filed on day of this event 1-12-2014. NUFORC. I use NUFORC to reference events, especially

those that my cameras capture

I could not connect the dots? This disconnect indicated it was indeed zig-zagging, however; Up and Down.This explains the fanning

which is seen in the objects composite signature, when it passed the cameras field of vision.

The Time Lapse analysis conducted in Kokomo Indiana, Tornado Alley. We captured many aircraft, all of which moved at

conventional velocity. However; whatever streaked by was moving 10-20 times faster than the jets (conventional) in the air.

We examined several factors in this study. What's captured, moving at extreme velocity, is a Red Pyramid shaped object. As

it passes, were looking at the green navigation light side of any conventional aircraft. What's imaged as it passes on the

green side, is red? An impossibility based on conventional navigational lighting configurations associated to commercial and

military aircraft.

2-11-2014 Red UFO*. I'm unsure of what I'm imaging, in this composite of frames. (Washington DC)

The overall characteristics of this object, captured in Sedona AZ, are the same. Click on image for sequence analysis.

Based on this 2012 Sedona Arizona UFO event, showing an Object (UFO), drop out of warp enshroud in cloud matter, and stop,

while discharging smaller craft into the air. My research includes the exact same UFOs as shown in the Indianapolis example,

and Sedona Arizona. Both examples show Red and White random lights, however; in perspective differences? Both examples

are essentially captured under the same conditions. Both samples are 20 mm, both samples essentially showing the same

star formations, however; under different visual perspectives and locations. Sample: Discovery Science: Uncovering Aliens.

Cylinder UFO Washington DC. Used as a reference regarding the energy contrail associated to UFOs. Initially encountered in

AREA 51 Nevada.