Uncovering Aliens on Discovery's Animal Planet
I am Proud to be a cast member (in my series in Sedona) to Uncovering Aliens on Discovery's Animal Planet/
Discovery Science/American Heroes
I am Proud to be a cast member (in my series in Sedona) to Uncovering Aliens on Discovery's Animal Planet
This version of Uncovering Aliens is enhanced with actual HD digital footage. It may not be advisable for children*
Wilbur Allen and John B. Wells on Imaginative Worlds
The Search for ET Portals and Bases: AREA 51/Sedona/Washington DC (National Geographic)
My Big Redneck Vacation UFOdc.com
It is my opinion that this abandoned structure is an ET Base, and that any and all abandoned structures can indeed
be bases for anomalous objects such as spheres which can materialize . Though the basis of this example is built upon
still frame imagery taken in rapid continuous succession, my samples are now filmed 60 FPS in motion picture.
The begriming of the shoot, and an indicator of things too come? There are 2 airborne anomalies with attributes like "Orbs".
However; they are only imaged in this session in this 1 image* 1.5 hours later, we ended up @ the abandoned church* (Below)
Apparently, this event started much earlier than concluded.*
4-25-2016 UFO Sphere Triangular Formation SM SDM Analysis
I reopened this file only to discover an additional image taken moments earlier, than what I thought to be the first image manifestation of
this object. IN this sample frame left, top of image, is an unknown luminous light source in the sky. It only appears in this image (sky).
Luminous light source in the sky, and 1 of 2 anomaly objects in this sample
Object 2, in sample one, may be my primary anomaly subject*. This anomaly appears only one time in this position*
Anomaly 2 in frame 1 of anomalous manifestation
6-10-2010. This was originally a Fashion shoot for Urban Haute Couture
This event is most spectacular: beneath Ravyn (supermodel in pink dress), is a luminous anomaly extending from the wall of the church*
Frame 1 Anomaly: Upon examination, it is noticed that this object has numerous energy protrusions*, and appears to be protruding
from the brick on the wall. A closer look at this object, shows a energy anomaly with several energy tentacles.
Frame 1 Anomaly: This anomaly morphed into a larger object in less than 2.5 seconds. Captured in 5 frames of continuous action*
THe anomaly is now beneath Rissa Richards, and Adriana B models in white dresses (center) and upper left. The anomaly seems to
pass between solid structures, manifesting on the metal rim of the stairs. However, I should mention and show a sample taken 1.5 hours
earlier on 12th and U Street. * Below
The anomaly is now spherical from a triangular configuration in the initial manifestation sample. The physical attributes morphed
from a small object too that which is substantially larger. In some cases morphing is a constant factor in some UFO anomalies*
Looking at the gradient qualities generated in analysis, we are able to conclude certain attributes specific too anomalies within
energy fields (propulsion field required to generate liftoff)
Inverted analysis shows essentially the same energy barrier around this anomaly in this limited state. It changes again in the next
frame, taken in high speed strobe rear curtain technology (D700 Nikon @ H1/20000 ISO)
Frame 3: The anomaly is now larger and elevated higher "in" the wall* The anomaly is between the wall and open space in front of
A close analysis shows that this object projected a beam of light on the elbow of model Rissa Richards (white dress). The anomaly is
also in a horizontal configuration which resembles Saturn.
It is a protrusion from within the wall of this abandoned church in NW DC. This sequence represents 2.5 seconds of action in HD Strobe
Frame 4, and the object takes another shape and configuration, from a horizontal perspective too vertical?
Much larger than its original size and configuration, the anomaly flies out the image.. However 20 days later and moving
at hypersonic velocity and imaged @ 1/8000 second, this object is still essentially a blur. If not for the fact this is a multiple
frame capture, the basis of my assertions would easily be dismissed or debunked. However; they are not and cannot be
debunked because of the number of physical representations obtained in the high speed sampling.
Imaged 7-01-2010 1/8000 second. This however is not the only abstract anomaly I imaged in this sequence.*
Though a blur, I an forced by example to conclude this object to be the same as that which I imaged @ the abandoned church
with the models. I cannot tell you what I imaged at this extraordinary speed (1/8000th second).
Extreme close-up of airborne anomaly 5-28-2011
A repeat capture of this unknown White Oblong Winged UFO Anomaly 5-28-2011* Recaptured Imaged @ 1/8000th of a second
in a series of images. It appears clearly in this sample of images *
Lawrenceville NJ 11-12-2010 12:12 PM
Frames taken in sequence @ 1/8000th of a second . 12 frames total in sequence, each with UFO anomalies which were unseen*
Imaged consistently during this event, is this single blue orb anomaly
This anomaly is consistent with the objects imaged 6-10-2010* in
Lawrenceville NJ 11-12-2010
I cannot tell you what this object is, however imaged @ 1/8000th of a second, it is essentially still a blur!
Enhanced sample of airborne anomaly
Enhanced HD sample showing a very abstract airborne multicolored object
Enhancing the sample, using dropdown filtration menu profiles: Solarization applied to image sample. The application generally
mutes conventional swatch colors too Black or gradient of Black*; however, this did not happen with the colors on this sample?
8-27-2010 @ 2:15 PM, this sample taken @ 1/8000th of a second, showing airborne anomalies, which were not seen*
There are several anomalies in this sample which are most spectacular! The first and obvious is the dual anomaly, which upon
close analysis looks exactly like 7-01-2010 (Physical characteristics match 100%, 2 white disproportional protrusions and a black
Consider this sample is a blur, however the exposure levels indicate it should not be blurred? It is. Taken 1/8000th of a second
@ F-32. Camera sensitivity 400 ISO. I found L2 limited in the areas away from the Sun. HOwever if you are looking at the Sun
specifically, then it is advised to limit your camera too a very low setting, minimizing damage to the CCD of the camera.
However for the area around the sun, and not the sun specifically, then I would go with 400 ISO as I did in this sample.
Enhanced sample showing additional anomalies which are concealed in the Suns intensity
4-13-2012 UFO Anomaly, this is not an insect with a luminous protrusion. Consistent with the anomaly imaged which
resembles a fly, however without visible extremities. 1/8000th of a second @ F-22
This is not an insect, and the protrusion is energy based* 4-13-2012
4-16-2012 Note the anomaly single energy protrusion is consistent with the anomaly from 4-13-2012 (above)
4-16-2012 Anomaly enhanced
5-21-2010: Anomaly, mistaken for a fly, has clipped wings? There are no wings on the opposite side of this object*
The image is taken from street level, aiming upwards towards the sky. The perspective would be the bottom of the fly
9-01-2011, Also taken at 1/8000th of a second and aimed directly upwards
Anomaly enhanced (Note the dorsal configuration on this object and the object below.
4-08-2012 airborne anomaly imaged at 1/8000th of a second at F-22.
Sample indicates dorsal's are propulsion byproducts of this object.
Comparative analysis of anomaly and known Housefly configurations
Possible Wasp, however, why is its main frame glowing?
Continue to Next Chapter