Band of Light Lightships and Luminous Cylinder UFO's
The specifics of this research is primarily focused upon "The Third Object"; Pale Band of Light, twice the size
of an aircraft carrier. The following is a quote from the event referencing the Third Object, Band of Light UFO.
This study is built upon empirical evidence, comparative forensic analysis. These are actual samples, no photo
manipulation (Photoshop/CGI) are applies to any of the data presented within this comparative analysis
examples. All imagery, ISO 204800/409600/4 Million imaging technology.
First contact of the Pale Band of Light (for me), was in AREA 51 Nevada.
All examples, with exceptions (Japan Cylinder 2012/Grumman Ground Satellite technology, 1960):
Wilbur Allen. Page also includes extensive research by Dr. Bruce Maccabee PhD.
All video/image files used in this study are built upon AVID/Boris Fx Technology/Nikon HD 35 mm full frame digital
Captain Kenju Terauchi, Japan Airlines Flight 1628 in 1986.
Little did Captain Terauchi realize, that this event and anomalies described by the crew, would be prevalent
within the course of this research. I'll also mention the Band of Light UFO and its documentation in Space
by Dr. Kip Thorne (How ET Enters Our Airspace) onboard MIR Space Station in the i990's, and by Grumman
Ground Satellite Tracking technology in 1960. The examples are current, rendered with State of The Art imaging
systems (Nikon/AVID/Boris Fx/Autodesk 64)
Original data from Dr. Bruce Maccabee's report. The Band of Light UFOs sampled in this study can possibly match the
information given by Captain Kenju Terauchi. These examples were obtained with extraordinary imaging and image
rendering technologies. All image samples are Forensic and presented in a comparative manner. Did Captain Terauchi
see a dimensionally augmented craft?
Sedona Arizona, 4-08-2013. I never realized this Band of Light UFO would be prevalent within the scope of this
research. The Pale Band of Light UFO in Sedona Arizona airspace. The basis for comparative analysis and forensic
interpretations. These are forensic interpretations based on several High Definition video samples. To my surprise;
this anomaly was not 100% straight, it was slightly warped. Using Autodesk 3dsmax2016 and virtual camera tech,
I perform HD analysis on moving objects, tracking their moves throughout the course of action. Events associated
too the Band of Light UFO are updated nightly. Based on my data, this object has the ability to augment its
structure. It is possible that Captain Kenju Terauchi saw one of these objects in its expanded state (full sized),
Nikon D4 using 20 mm f/2.8 lens @ ISO 51200 the UFO Band of Light materialized into the image stream sample.as illustrated
below this Sedona example. Its the first High Definition capture of this anomaly in Sedona Arizona airspace.
Forensic samples obtained by advanced imaging systems. Second Contact: Sedona Arizona. The anomaly communicated
telepathically, instructing me to image these Entry and Exit Portals. The additional materials provided support this video
data. This footage was obtained while filming "Uncovering Aliens", BBC/Discovery Networks. Time laps was the only way
to document long periods of time (5 hours). For the Sedona duration scans, I used 1 frame per second and a 30 fps
frame rate (video encoding for playback). File footage processed in Avid Media Composer 7. (BBC/Discovery Networks)
The various structural states associated with this Cylinder-Band of Light UFO Anomaly, varies. Such as the example
below showing this anomaly with an extended energy field. Common factors in both samples (above and below) are
the protruding energy tail, a byproduct of the UFO's propulsion matrix.
The anomaly materialized into the sequence, during an extended Time Lapse sequence, designed to capture
UFOs during the filming of Uncovering Aliens. This is the worlds first High Definition sample of this anomaly on
record. Above, the Cylinder UFO with an energy field and tail. It resembles a sperm cell, as does its flight
characteristics. I am unsure if they are generating Portals or if the Portals are fixed Geospatially in position?
The UFO may have the abilities to offset Time and Space. Required energy to do so, would have to be Nuclear.
However; this study is built upon visual evidence in a comparative manner to illustrate points associated to UFOs.
Unaltered data maintains forensic authenticity. There ares no Photoshop or CGI (enhancements) applied here.
The UFO has an extended energy field. This extended field could give you the impression of a much larger object,
however; it is the same object as below. (Comparative Analysis) My initial capture of this anomaly was in
AREA 51 Nevada 2012. (Click on image above to enter Area 51 chapter)
(Research by Dr. Bruce Maccabee. Click on image for full report)
JAL 1628 UFO sketch by Captain Kenju Terauchi. Is it possible he saw a Cylinder UFO with an energy barrier like
the example above?
Scott Pelley and the CBS Evening News 9-29-2016, had an unannounced visitor while filming the News at the CBS
News, US Capitol studios location, in Washington DC. (Live news cast documentation) Sample image provided by
12-25-2016 UFO Band of Light WARP SDM Analysis
Objects which enter into the airspace through Spatial Anomalies (Portals) as demonstrated by this exceptional
example. The object emerges suddenly, however in its initial entrance into the airspace is partial. It suddenly
vanishes after appearance.
Nikon D4S @ 60 fps using 24 mm f/1.4 lens @ ISO 102400. A full flyby of the UFO Band of Light @ altitude.
Where the first objects disappeared, Captain Terauchi now noticed a pale band of light that mirrored their altitude,
speed and direction. Setting their onboard radar scope to a 25 nautical miles (46 km) range, he confirmed an object
in the expected 10 o'clock direction at about 7.5 nmi (13.9 km) distance, and informed ATC of its presence. Anchorage
found nothing on their radar, but Elmendorf ROCC, directly in his flight path, reported a "surge primary return" after
Nikon D5 with 200 mm f/2.8 @ ISO 102400. The basis of comparative analysis is to have exemplary examples in
which to draw an opinion. Here we see the Band of Light UFO WARP by at extreme velocity. Instances as such,
would be defined by the blink of an eye. If you blinked, you missed it. Constants relative to this object are its
luminous qualities (attributes), and the nuclear green propulsion matrix contrail, which is represented within this
Aircraft-UFO comparative, 2 samples taken from the same night in which the Band of Light UFO appeared. The
commercial aircraft and UFO were imaged along the same plain, assuming they're both within the same altitudes,
dwarfs the Band of Light UFO which may be substantially larger (however smaller) in this comparative. Its (UFO)
substantially larger and faster than the commercial/military aircraft.
Transient WARP, the object is both here and in another state (that which is not relative to Earth)
As the city lights of Fairbanks began to illuminate the object, captain Terauchi believed to perceive the outline
of a gigantic spaceship on his port side that was "twice the size of an aircraft carrier". I asked a friend:
Admiral Roger Gilbertson if a Jumbo jet could land on an aircraft carrier? (Yes and No!) Yes if the carrier tower
was not present, however it would require rigging. But in reality No, it is physically impossible for large aircraft
(Jumbo jets/B-52/C5-A) to make carrier landings*. However; proportionally speaking, the jumbo jet and carrier(s)
in the illustration, are proportionally correct.
Another clear example of a Spatial Portal in use by the occupants of this large Band of Light UFO anomaly.
The proportions associated with this object, within this study, varies with magnification (lens) and cameras only. In
most of my captures, lens ranging from 10 mm-200 mm. Each file capture, in most cases, captured sounds
associated with the UFO as it passed through the image area. The sounds recorded 7.1 DTS, tracks the anomaly
within the course of the recorded actions.
What Captain Terauchi did not have were visual confirmations associated with the "Band of Light UFO". However; He
was not the first to document/encounter this extreme UFO. The abilities of this object transcends all possible levels of
technology at our current level of standards.
Presenting the evidence required a plethora of data, each supportive within itself. Extreme captures (D5 Nikon),
processed with extreme technology AVID Media Composer 8.6.3/Boris Fx BCC Complete
Grumman Ground Satellite Technology captured the Band of Light anomaly following a surveillance satellite in 1960.
With power in numbers, we can safely assume the validity associated with this known (1960) UFO Band of Light
This study also includes several Hyper-Full Spectrum Infrared samples. These are hybrid samples in IR showing in
Infrared the Band of Light UFO. The specifications of this camera exceed those of HUBBLE along IR/UV/X-ray
Most samples are imaged within the same event span, usually seconds or moments apart.
UFO Band of Light imaged H-FSIR, as recommended by my associates @ NASA Science. A full analysis of this UFO
would require data within non visible thresholds (Infrared). All IR samples are 30 fps at extreme shutter speeds, as
provided by the camera (1920 P HD)
Comparative analysis based upon the plethora of matching data, suggests there is an active presence of this object
and its occupants, within our airspace. Understanding the methods in which ET utilizes to gain entry and exit from
any given airspace, with shed light on the ease in which these extraterrestrials travel.
This example captured the UFO Band of Light at extreme altitude. The small it appears on film, the farther it is from
the camera. Those that appear large, are obviously closer to the camera, and well within our airspace, just above the
rooftops . The sounds and contrails are all essentially the same. Sounds captured are those emitted by the UFOs.
Infrared samples are per NASA recommendations.
The presentation of repeating evidence, all obtained within a fixed pool of analysis. The probabilities of events as
such, repeating in a fixed region of space, art astronomical, next to impossible due to the randomness associated
with naturally occurring phenomena within any fixed airspace. The odds of finding a needle in the haystack.
Propulsion Matrix sounds and Nuclear Green contrails are all signatures of the particular UFO (Band of Light UFO)
Leading through forensic examples, we can draw upon the samples, information associated with the operations of
these crafts. The sound associations are relative in the presentation of forensic evidence. In most cases, the sound
associations relative to the objects presented are missing, casting doubt on the validity of the samples (old TV
The point of analysis is to show through a comparative analysis, events which match forensically, based on physical
descriptive attributes associated with what is called the "Band of Light UFO/Cylinder UFO". (below)
Most examples show what is an obvious yet constant trajectory associated with this Band of Light UFO. The
trajectory is in line with the White House, which believes this activity does not exist in the DC Area?
Using Hybrid Hyper-Full Spectrum Infrared technology (FSIR-ISO 204800) we are able to show the Band of Light
UFO in Infrared.
All samples matched definitions based on characteristics. These sample illustrate the altitude differentials associated
with each forensic capture. Leading the analysis through definitions associated with each unique yet specific capture.
Explaining how something as random as a shooting star, can be consistent in occurrences, is to state with undue
certainty, the possibilities that these are intelligently guided crafts. The frequency of events clearly indicates a
In most samples, such as this one, the UFO is the same size. This suggests the object is at a greater altitude
during the capture. (Smaller-higher up, farther from the lens POV/Larger-closer to the lens POV)
Variations are also attributed to camera lens configuration. Lens Systems range from 10 mm- 200 mm, and frame
rate (30/60 fps)
Certainly, each example (obtained through various cameras) can't be the byproducts of inferior lens/camera
technology? These are superior examples of spatial anomalies (UFOs) generated with extraordinary camera gear!
A plethora of never ending examples which all manifest within the fixed pool of analysis indicates extensive Portal
activities and conditions.
Though faint, the Band of Light UFO was neither here nor there, in solid form. Its in a transient state of materialization.
Its detection associated with extreme High ISO sensitivities within the imager used to capture the event (Nikon D5)..
The extensive nature of the forensic capture presented in this study, could not possibly be "naturally occurring"
phenomena, however more so associated with Intelligent Control.
UFO Cylinder Objects with spiral forwards trajectories,which don't fly into the airspace, however; "materialize" into it.
The Band of Light UFO is no stranger to Washington DC airspace. This is a forensically confirmed UFO based on
The Cylinder UFO (Luminous)
A National Geographic reference file, this UFO Cylinder was first captured in Shreveport Louisiana 11-01-2012
November 16, 2012, 15 days after my initial capture, this stunning video was filmed in Japan. I never realized this
UFO would also be prevalent within the course of this research. The way in which they enter and exit our airspace,
generally undetected until manifestation into our realm, visible on Radar upon entrance into any given airspace.
The Nuclear Green contrail is associated to this objects propulsion matrix. It usually happens when the object
goes to WARP: Entry into Spatial Portal, or exiting out of a Spatial Portal.
Constantly updated materials (11-05-2016), provides a more comprehensive perspective relative to each UFO in this
case study. Each file contains the same kind of anomaly.
The smaller the object appears on camera, indicates its altitude from the
Portal Entry into our Airspace: The way in which ET enters our realm, is within the scope of Quantum Physics.
Radar can't detect what's not there, until it is there (physical manifestation). The manner in which this object enters
and exits the airspace, is based on samples captured within this fixed pool of analysis. There are no deviations within
this study other than lens/camera(s) configurations. We now look at the specifics associated with this Cylinder UFO and
the conditions in which it is captured (FPA: Fixed Pool of Analysis)
1-05-2017 UFO Cylinder SM SDM Full Tracker Analysis 1, with constant updates associated with this Cylinder UFO,
establishing forensic consistency in both the UFO object and the area in which these events take place. We see with
certainty, the capsule shaped UFO and its flight capabilities. There are several files which have this object UFO in
various stages of flight and structural development. I can show the way in which these UFO anomalies are Entering
and exiting our realm.
The Cylinder flyby showed this object was in a curved trajectory (turning). Its a full flyby of the Cylinder UFO,
captured using Nikon D4S @ 60 fps. This is a full flyby of the cylinder anomaly. In this example, the UFO is
maintaining a curved trajectory. (Its not flying straight). This quality is not one of the properties or attributes
of a naturally occurring phenomena such as a meteor.
Cylinder exiting the airspace through known Spatial Portal (within the pool of analysis). D5 capture shows the
incremental dematerialization of this object upon entrance of the Portal.
Both this and the file above it, are within the same airspace (Pool of Analysis: PoA). We can conclude from the
frequency and types of events, that my PoA is a pathway to and from Portals. Probabilities associated to naturally
occurring events/ phenomena indicate that these samples are not naturally occurring, however; intelligently control
space craft with exceptional capabilities.
The data associated with this Cylinder UFO is forensic. I have shown the possibilities associated with this UFO anomaly
with various levels of documentation. The object Entering the airspace, the object in several fly through's, the object
in levels of materialization and dematerialization. All samples obtained from a fixed region of Space. Sounds are the
additional perks relative to this data. The UFOs have mechanical sounds, though nothing I can immediately identify.
The various degrees of the anomaly includes directional variations, however most trajectories maintain consistency.
The various degrees of the anomaly includes directional variations, as shown here. It's the same as the sample
above it, however; its flight trajectory is 180 degrees different than the first video sample showing the same
The sample are quite specific, and easily categorized based on overall object (UFO) definitions.
Samples imaged showing the Cylinder UFO well beneath cloud levels, as the clouds as its background. This indicates
altitude proximity (not in the outer atmosphere). I'm using 24 mm f/1.4 @ 1/250th of a second shutter speeds. The
higher shutter speeds are attributed to the cloud background luminosity. At night, street light reflectance enhances
overcast cloud coverage.
Clouds as its (UFO) background. This indicates altitude proximity (not in the outer atmosphere). If this transpired
in the outer atmosphere, the examples would not have physical definitions, however optical distortions associated
with the atmosphere.
Having scientific grade data to form an analysis, we can see this anomaly is truly extraordinary and exceeding that
which we use in technology.
Altitude proximity, the clouds are well above this object and its flight trajectory.
These 2 samples (below inclusive), are of the same object, however one is larger due to proximity to the lens. The
lens configurations preclude this technology from seeing outer atmosphere events. For outer atmosphere 400 mm
would be required. However, long lens do not have light gathering capabilities at greater than f/2.8. Light gathering
capabilities are diminish considerably in pure nocturnal environments, requiring light gathering abilities that can only
be achieved with a faster lens (f/1.4/1.8/2.0/2.8). Beyond these levels, in nocturnal environments, the lens is totally
useless unless used for duration imaging (Time Exposures).
Each showing the same things under different time conditions, the area of analysis is relative (fixed).
2 samples of a Cylinder UFO both coming and going, this sample going..
2 samples of a Cylinder UFO both coming and going, this sample coming.. both along the same yet opposite
All samples are imaged in a fixed region of Geo-space, though space changes due to orbital rotations, the events are
all fixed geographically by the ground coordinates of the imaging systems.
Depending on the objects forwards velocity, some samples show what is the objects propulsion matrix contrail. Its
The Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail.
The Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail. Proof is indeed in the pudding, with this extraordinary sample (IR) showing
the Nuclear Green Propulsion Matrix Contrail associated to the Cylinder UFO (Going to WARP).
Depending on the objects forwards velocity, the contrail is most apparent at maximum WARP* as shown in the
event documentation These samples do not meet the definition associated with a "Shooting Star".
Definition: a small, rapidly moving meteor burning up on entering the earth's atmosphere. These files do not meet
the definitions associated with a Shooting Star?
(They're not entering into the atmosphere; they're materializing into it)
The propulsion systems onboard these craft must be Nuclear to achieve Quantum WARP (Teleportation) of the
entire craft and its occupants, through Space. The objects "materialize into the airspace", not "fly into it, as
a "Shooting Star".
8-15-2016 UFO Cylinder 2 Green Beam SM WARP SMD Analysis. (Note: This is an exact match to 8-14-2015)
8-14-2015 UFO Green Beam WARP SDM Analysis. How is this possible? 2 exact samples, exactly 1 year apart and
essentially on the same date. Both samples show the exact same things!
8-15-2013 and the return of an unusual UFO anomaly and its Nuclear Green contrail
These are repeating objects and events. Where indicated note the dates associated with each comparative (where
indicated) Is there a temporal anomaly associated with this region of Space known as my Pool of Analysis? How am
I imaging events with exactness, though on the same day on a different year?
The example clearly shows the UFO anomaly materializing into the airspace. There is a distinctive difference in an object
that flies into the airspace as compared to an object which uses Quantum materialization to enter into the airspace.
Matching objects and the frequencies associated with exact events, we can draw a conclusion from the plethora of
evidence obtained nightly from a fixed Pool of Analysis (90 degrees straight up over my roof 4 blocks from the White
The size differentials may be attributed to the altitude relative to the anomaly at the time of capture.
The possibility may also exist, that these objects do vary in size and displacement. That these smaller examples
may be scout ships (small Bands of Light).
Consistencies associated to these samples, and the repeating levels of action within my fixed pool of analysis, have
demonstrated with certainty, the validity associated to UFOs and the truths associated to Spatial Anomalies (Portals)
as demonstrated by this sample, concludes a strong extraterrestrial presence within the Washington DC airspace.
How they exit the airspace, especially when the exit portal is within the cloud layer which is fog like. The diffusion
associated with this event are clear indicators of altitude proximity.
Well we know who most certainly is not truthful! If this ET did not exist, and I am in the same Airspace as the
White House, then how do I explain the work within this research? We voted these people into office!
This page is under construction, please return later (refresh your browser upon return, to see updates*